Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/207/2024 of MRS SHOBHA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 19 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010006122024 NC: 2026:KHC:51603 CRL.P No. 207 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 207 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. MRS SHOBHA W/O SRI. K. PADMANABHA @ RAVI AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 207 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
MRS SHOBHA
W/O SRI. K. PADMANABHA @ RAVI
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
2.
SRI PADMANABHA @ RAVI
S/O LATE K.T KENCHAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
HOUSE NO.149/3, 2ND MAIN,
MANJUNATH COMPLEX,
BYRASANDRA MAIN ROAD,
1ST BLOCK EAST, JAYANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 011.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. DHANANJAYA N.R, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
SIDDAPURA P.S.
JAYANAGAR SUB-DIVISION,
BANGALORE
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU-560 001.
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
SMT. K. RATHNAMMA
D/O LATE ESHWAR
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
R/AT NO.3563, 11TH MAIN
3RD CROSS, CHANDRA NAGARA
KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT
BENGALURU-78
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.12670/2019
PENDING
BEFORE
THE
IV
ADDL.C.M.M.,
BENGALURU
REGISTERED
BY
THE
SIDDAPURA
POLICE
STATION
(RESPONDENT NO.1 HEREIN) AGAINST THE PETITIONERS FOR
THE OFFENCE P/U/S 406, 420, 120B R/W 34 OF IPC AND
SECTION 76 OF CHIT FUND ACT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This Court ordered to issue notice to respondent No.2 on 27.03.2025. Despite, the petitioners have not paid process fee. As such, the matter is lying at the stage of orders since one and half years.
2. Today also there is no representation for the petitioners.
HC-KAR
3. In such circumstances, there is no reason to grant further time and it could be presumed that the petitioners are not interested to pursue this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
4. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
CR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5