Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/443/2020 of SRI. RIYAZ Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 19 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010521652019 NC: 2026:KHC:51468 CRL.P No. 443 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 443 OF 2020 BETWEEN: SRI. RIYAZ S/O M. UMMAR, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O MUKVE
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 443 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
SRI. RIYAZ
S/O M. UMMAR,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
R/O MUKVE HOUSE,
NARIMOGARU VILLAGE,
PUTTUR TALUK, D.K. - 574 202.
…PETITIONER
(VIDE ORDER DATED 09.11.2021,
BY SRI. VIVEK HEGDE, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. SUYOG HERELE E, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH PUTTUR TOWN POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY
ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
2.
SRI. KESHAVA NAYAK
S/O SRI. SANJEEVA NAYAK,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
R/O MYRA HOUSE,
BILIYURU VILLAGE,
PERNE POST,
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
BANTWAL TALUK - 574 325.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. DIWAKAR MADDUR, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. SUDEEP BANGERA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.1436/2019 ON
THE FILE OF THE LEARNED PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
ACJM AT PUTTUR FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 326, 504, 506, 307 R/W 149 OF IPC (VIDE
ANNEXURE-A).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent No.1 and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.2 are present.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge has already been framed and seeks liberty to raise all the grounds urged before this Court during the course of the trial.
HC-KAR
3. In view of the said submission, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous, reserving liberty to the petitioner to raise all the grounds urged before this Court during the course of the trial.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
GJM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19