Karnataka High Court
CCC/168/2025 of SRI M K SRINIVAS Vs SRI RAGHUNANDAN A N on 19 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010095302025 NC: 2026:KHC:51409-DB CCC No. 168 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.168 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.168 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. M.K.SRINIVAS,
S/O LATE KRISHNADAS,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
R/AT FLAT NO.302, 3RD FLOOR,
14TH MAIN, 6TH CROSS,
R.K.LAYOUT, PADMANABHANAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 070.
2.
SRI. M.K.NAGARAJ,
S/O LATE. KRISHNADAS,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
R/AT NO.52, SRI VIJAYA DEEPA,
22ND MAIN, 38TH CROSS, 4TH T BLOCK,
JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 041.
REP. BY THEIR G.P.A. HOLDER
SRI.N.B.MOHANA CHANDRA,
S/O LATE BOREGOWDA,
MAJOR
R/AT 8, 5TH CROSS,
SHIVU EXTENTION,
MARIYAPPANA PALYA,
BENGALURU-560 056.
…COMPLAINANTS
(BY SRI.LOHITASWA BANAKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI.RAGHUNANDAN.A.N,
COMMISSIONER,
MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
Digitally
signed by K G
RENUKAMBA
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
JHANSI RANI LAKSHMI BAI ROAD,
CHAMARAJAPURA,
CHAMARAJAPURA MOHALLA,
LAKSHMIPURAM, MYSORE-570 005.
2.
SRI. MANJUNATH,
THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,
JHANSI RANI LAKSHMI BAI ROAD,
CHAMARAJAPURA,
CHAMARAJAPURA MOHALLA,
LAKSHMIPURAM,
MYSORE-570 005.
…ACCUSED
(BY SMT. SADHANA S DESAI., ADVOCATE FOR A1 & A2)
THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS
11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE
215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, PRAYING
TO
TAKE
COGNIZANCE
AND
INITIATE
CONTEMPT
PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST
THE
ACCUSED
FOR
HAVING
INTENTIONALLY AND DELIBERATELY DISOBEYED THE ORDER DATED
20.03.2024 IN W.P.NO.6437/2024 (LA-UDA) PASSED BY THE
LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS COURT BY PASSING APPROPRIATE
ORDERS.
THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
and
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
When the matter was listed on 18.09.2026, the following order was passed:
"The contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 20.03.2024 in W.P.No.6437/2024.
HC-KAR
In the order of 20.03.2024, noticing the representation dated 30.09.2021 moved by the complainants, requesting for allotment of a site in terms of 50:50 prescribed therein, the complainants were directed to furnish a fresh representations, which was directed to be considered and disposed of within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
A compliance affidavit has been filed on 12.09.2025 by R.Manjunath/accused No.2 which reflects that the endorsement has been made observing that, a resolution of the Board of the Authority regarding the allocation of land in the ratio of 50:50 in the Government order is quashed and ordered in accordance with the powers conferred under Section 67 of the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987. It is further stated that in the Government letter, it has been directed that no decision shall be taken in such cases till the Government prepares guidelines on allotment of plots and provision of land as land compensation. Accordingly, it has observed that at present there is no opportunity to consider the appeal as per the Rules.
Though the endorsement is worded strangely, given the direction and import of the order of the writ Court, we find that the representation has been considered and a decision taken. However, it appears that no apology has been tendered.
Learned Counsel for the accused seeks a short adjournment, to enable her to obtain instructions in the matter.
List on 19.09.2026."
2. Today affidavits are filed in Court on behalf of accused No.2 and the present Commissioner of Mysuru Development Authority which have been perused by us. The
HC-KAR
affidavits are taken on record. The apology is accepted and the contempt case is consigned.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE
KSR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1