Karnataka High Court
CRP/883/2025 of SMT. PADMA Vs SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI on 19 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010770132025 NC: 2026:KHC:51414 CRP No.883/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.883 OF 2025 (IO) BETWEEN: SMT. PADMA W/O MAHADEVA AGED 55 YEARS R/AT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.883 OF 2025 (IO)
BETWEEN:
SMT. PADMA
W/O MAHADEVA
AGED 55 YEARS
R/AT NO.91/1, 1ST MAIN ROAD
A CROSS, BYATARAYANAPURA
MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE-560026.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ADITYA S. KUMAR, ADV.,)
AND:
SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI
W/O CHATRANAYAK
AGED 52 YEARS
R/AT NO.1/4, 8TH CROSS
OPPO. TO PAPANNA MUTTON STALL
BYATARAYANAPURA, MYSORE ROAD
BANGALORE-560026.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRP IS FILED U/S. 115 OF CPC, 1908, PRAYING
TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN O.S.NO.2516/2023
PENDING BEFORE THE IX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE AT BANGALORE (CCH-5). SET ASIDE
THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED ON I.A. FILED U/S 151 OF
CPC
(ANNEXURE-A)
DATED
23.10.2025
AND
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE IA FILED U/S 151 CPC
SEEKING PERMISSION TO FILE WRITTEN STATEMENT OF
THE
REVISION
PETITIONER/DEFENDANT
NO.3
IN
O.S.NO.2516/2023 (ANNEXURE-B) FILED BEFORE THE
HON’BLE THE IX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AT BANGALORE (CCH-5) BY TAKING THE WRITTEN
STATEMENT FILED ALONG WITH IA U/S 151 OF CPC
(ANNEXURE-C) & ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is questioning the order dated 23.10.2025, passed on an application in O.S.No.2516/2023, by the IX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, whereby the trial Court rejected the application and refused to take the written statement on record.
2. The office has raised an objection with regard to maintainability of this Civil Revision Petition in view of Section 115 of the CPC on 12.12.2025. Office objections are sustained. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that there are no bonafides on the part of the petitioner in prosecuting the matter.
HC-KAR
3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as not maintainable.
i. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18