Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/1984/2020 of SRI T H IMAM HUSSAIN Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 19 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010027432020 NC: 2026:KHC:51474 CRL.P No. 1984 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1984 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. T.H. IMAM HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O LATE
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1984 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. T.H. IMAM HUSSAIN
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
S/O LATE T. MOHAMMED HABEEBULLA
CHC 1317, TOWN POLICE STATION
CHITRADURGA TOWN AND DISTRICT-577501
OLD ADDRESS: P.1170, RURAL POLICE STATION
CHITRADURGA-577500.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. TAJUDDIN, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY O/O ADVOCATE GENERAL
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT COMPLEX BUILDINGS
BANGALORE-560 001.
2.
SMT. SUMA W/O SIDDESH
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
HOUSE WIFE
R/AT BIMASAMUDRA VILLAGE
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-57750.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SUHAS GOWDA M., HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. M. DEVARAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C
PRAYING TO QUASH THE ANNEXURE-C AND SUMMONS
PROCESS ISSUED AS PER ANNEXURE-E THE IMPUGNED ORDER
OF TAKING COGNIZANCE FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S. 323, 324, 326, 354, 504 AND 506 R/W 149 OF IPC DATED 04.06.2019
PASSED BY THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., CHITRADURGA VIDE ANNEXURE-C BY ALLOWING THIS CRL.P
IN SO FAR IT IS PERTAINING TO PETITIONER WHO IS 6TH
ACCUSED IN PCR NO.141/2012 IN THE COURT OF I
ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., CHITRADURGA AND
SUMMONS PROCESS ISSUED AGAINST 6TH ACCUSED VIDE
ANNEXURE-E.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This matter is called twice in the morning and also in the afternoon, no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Though this petition was filed in 2020, even after lapse of six years, learned counsel for the petitioner is not pursuing the matter. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 is present on both the occasions, so also learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1. Hence, it clearly
HC-KAR
discloses that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.
Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30