Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/3866/2020 of SRI VIJETHA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 19 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010128752020 NC: 2026:KHC:51494 CRL.P No. 3866 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3866 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. VIJETHA, S/O BOREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010128752020
NC: 2026:KHC:51494
CRL.P No. 3866 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3866 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. VIJETHA,
S/O BOREGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
OPPOSITE MSIL, KRS,
AGRAHARA, KUNIGAL TOWN,
TUMAKURU-572130.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. C.N.RAJU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
KUNIGAL POLICE STATION,
KUNIGAL TOWN, TUMAKURU-572130.
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BUILDING,
DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU-560001.
2.
KIRAN KUMAR B,
S/O LATE VENKATESH,
AGED: MAJOR,
R/AT KRS AGRAHARA,
KUNIGAL TOWN, TUMAKURU-572130.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.SUHAS GOWDA M., HCGP FOR R1)
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010128752020
NC: 2026:KHC:51494
CRL.P No. 3866 of 2020
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482
OF
CR.P.C.
PRAYING
TO
QUASH
THE
PROCEEDINGS
C.C.NO.84/2019 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNIGAL TUMAKURU, FOR THE OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 465, 468, 471, 420 R/W
SECTION 34 OF IPC IN FIR IN CR.NO.116/2019, KUNIGAL
POLICE STATION, TUMAKURU.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.1/State.
2. This Court heard the matter at length and when this Court was about to dictate the order, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file discharge application.
3. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file discharge application.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41