Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/460/2020 of S A JHAN MOHAMMED Vs LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED on 19 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010509092019 NC: 2026:KHC:51527 CRL.P No. 460 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 460 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. S.A. JHAN MOHAMMED AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O AMIR
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 460 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
1.
S.A. JHAN MOHAMMED
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
S/O AMIR KHAN,
R/AT NO 20, TRIPLICANE HIGH ROAD,
CHENNAI - 600 005.
2.
MRS. JAMEELA BEGUM
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
W/O S.A. JHAN MOHAMMED,
R/AT NO. 20, TRIPLICANE HIGH ROAD,
CHENNAI - 600 005.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. CHANDRAHASA RAI B, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED
OFFICE/AT 77, DEGREE TOWN CENTRE,
BUILDING NO.3, WEST WING,
OFF OLD AIRPORT ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 037,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
S. CHANDRASHEKARAN.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SANJANTHI SAJAN POOVAYYA, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.53417/2018
PENDING ON THE FILE OF XVII A.S.C.J. AND A.C.M.M., BENGALURU
ARISING
OUT
OF
COMPLAINT
AS
PER
ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the petition has become infructuous, as the petitioner has been convicted, and the said conviction has been confirmed in appeal as well as in revision. It is further submitted that the matter is now pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court. Since the challenge in the present petition is confined to the taking of cognizance of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the petition has become infructuous.
HC-KAR
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has produced the relevant documents in support of the said submission.
5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
GJM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21