Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/8037/2024 of JAYAMMA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA BY on 19 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010400282024 NC: 2026:KHC:51596 CRL.P No. 8037 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8037 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. JAYAMMA S/O DASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT P
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8037 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
JAYAMMA
S/O DASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
R/AT P MAHADEVAPURA VILLAGE,
CHALLAKERE TALUK,
PIN-577522
2.
DASAPPA
S/O GIRIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
R/AT P MAHADEVAPURA VILLAGE,
CHALLAKERE TALUK,
PIN-577522
3.
SHAILAJA
S/O DASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
R/AT P MAHADEVAPURA VILLAGE,
CHALLAKERE TALUK,
PIN-577522
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. LAKSHMIKANTH K, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
PARASHURAMPURA POLICE STATION,
REP BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BANGALORE 01
2.
SMT ANITHALAKSHMI
W/O D BHASKARA,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
R/AT MAHADEVAPURA VILLAGE
CHALLAKERE TALUK,
CHITRADURG DISTRICT
PIN-577 522
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESH P, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO
QUASH
THE
PROCEEDINGS
INITIATED
AGAINST
THE
PETITIONERS IN C.C.NO.312/2022, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S
498A, 323, 504, 506 R/W 149 OF IPC AND SEC. 3 AND 4 OF
D.P. ACT, ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT
CHALLAKERE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This Court ordered to issue notice to respondent No.2 on 16.07.2025. Despite, the petitioners have not paid process fee. As such, the matter is lying at the stage of orders since one year.
2. There is no representation for the petitioners.
HC-KAR
3. In such circumstances, there is no reason to grant further time and it could be presumed that the petitioners are not interested to pursue this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
4. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
CR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14