Karnataka High Court
WP/38678/2025 of MOHAMMED RAHEEL MOUSEEN Vs THE UNION OF INDIA on 19 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010846802025 NC: 2026:KHC:51359-DB WP No. 38678 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 38678 OF 2025 (S-CAT) BETWEEN:
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
WRIT PETITION NO. 38678 OF 2025 (S-CAT)
BETWEEN:
MOHAMMED RAHEEL MOUSEEN
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
S/O. MOHAMMED NASEERUDDIN,
ACCOUNTANT,
OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (AANDE)
KARNATAKA,
PARK HOUSE ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001,
RESIDING AT NO. 24,
GROUND FLOOR,
2ND CROSS, DHANANJAYA LAYOUT,
KITHAGANUR,
K.R. PURAM,
BENGALURU-560 036.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VIKRAM PHADKE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE UNION OF INDIA
DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND TRAINING,
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL,
Digitally signed
by AASEEFA
PARVEEN
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
P G AND PENSIONS,
NORTH BLOK,
NEW DELHI-110 001,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2.
THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR
GENERAL OF INDIA
NO. 9, DEEN DAYAL UPADHYAYA MARG,
NEW DELHI-110 124.
3.
THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E), KARNATAKA
PARK HOUSE ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY MRS. SADHANA S DESAI, CGC FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE AN ORDER/WRIT
OF CERTIORARI, SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 18.12.2025
PASSED
BY
THE
LEARNED
CENTRAL
ADMINISTRATIVE
TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH, IN O. A. No. 602/2025, AT
ANNEXURE-B
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
and
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT)
Heard learned counsel Sri.Vikram Phadke for the petitioner and learned CGC Smt.Sadhana.S.Desai for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
2. Learned counsel Sri.Vikram Phadke would submit that the above writ petition was filed questioning the interim order dated 18.12.2025 in OA No.602/2025 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal at Bengaluru, rejecting the prayer of the petitioner to stay notice of termination dated 26.11.2025 (Annexure-A8). Further learned counsel would submit that this Court by order dated 23.12.2025 stayed Annexure-A8 notice of termination dated 26.11.2025. However, the interim order made an observation that the petitioner not to claim any salary till he clears the examination.
3. Learned counsel Sri.Vikram Phadke would submit that subsequent to the interim order passed by this
HC-KAR
Court, the petitioner passed all required examination and on he passing the required departmental examination, the respondent by Office Order dated 29.06.2026 withdrew the notice of termination dated 26.11.2025. Thus he would submit that nothing would survive for consideration in the present writ petition and he seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Further, he submits that since in terms of this Court's order, he has already passed the required departmental examination, he may be permitted to claim salary.
4. Learned CGC Smt.Sadhana.S would not dispute the above fact. However, she submits that it would take some time to settle the benefits to the petitioner to which he would be entitled.
5. Be that as it may, the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
HC-KAR
7. Since the petitioner has passed all the departmental examination, it is open for the petitioner to claim salary for the period during which he has worked and it is open for the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law.
Pending IA's if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE NS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15