Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/1399/2024 of KAVYA HEGDE Vs STATE BY CYBER CRIME P S on 19 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010087212024 NC: 2026:KHC:51605 CRL.P No. 1399 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1399 OF 2024 BETWEEN: KAVYA HEGDE W/O PRAMOD M HEGDE, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010087212024
NC: 2026:KHC:51605
CRL.P No. 1399 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1399 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
KAVYA HEGDE
W/O PRAMOD M HEGDE,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
NO.56, VISHWADHAMA LAYOUT,
SADARAMANGLA KADUGODI POST,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK,
BANGALORE-560 067.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NAGALAKSHMI S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE BY CYBER CRIME P S
BANGALORE, REP BY P.P
2.
DEEPIKA G
D/O GOVINDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
NO. 87, KAMATH LAYOUT,
CHANNANAYAKANAPALYA,
NAGASANDRA POST,
BANGALORE NORTH-560 073
REP BY P.P
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESH P, ADVOCATE FOR R1,
SRI. VIKAS M, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO
QUASH CHARGE SHEET IN C.C.NO.8514/2020 ARISING OUT OF
CR.NO.1294/2019 DATED 25.02.2019 PENDING BEFORE THE
HON'BEL I A.C.M.M AT BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S
66(C), 66(D) OF I.AT ACT AND SEC.419, 420 OF IPC AND ALL
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010087212024
NC: 2026:KHC:51605
CRL.P No. 1399 of 2024
FURTHER INVESTIGATION AND PROCEEDINGS AS AGAINST
THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that, since the trial has already been commenced before the I Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall Unit, Bengaluru, in C.C.No.8514/2021 and three witnesses have already been examined, the petition does not survive for consideration.
3. In view of the submission, the petition is dismissed. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31