Karnataka High Court
MFA/575/2023 of SRI RAVIKUMAR Vs SMT PAVITHRA D R on 19 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010042912023 NC: 2026:KHC:51590-DB MFA No. 575 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 575 OF 2023 (MC)
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 575 OF 2023 (MC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI RAVIKUMAR
S/O.SRI.CHANNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
R/AT TOKASANDRA,
HAROHALLI HOBLI,
KANAKAPURA TALUK,
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562159
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SHEKARAPPA., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
SMT PAVITHRA D R
W/O. SRI.RAVIKUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
R/AT DODDA ELACHAGERE VILLAGE,
HALAGURU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT - 571401
…RESPONDENT
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 28(1) OF HINDU
MARRIAGE ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED:19.04.2022 PASSED IN MC NO.49/2021 ON THE FILE
OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MALAVALLI, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S.13(1)(ia) AND (ib) OF THE
HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955.
Digitally
signed by
VASANTHA
KUMARY B K
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
We have taken up this appeal in the revised call. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal either in the first call or in the revised call. This Court on 04.06.2024 passed the following order: "Learned counsel Sri. Shekarappa for the appellant is present before the Court physically. He seeks short accommodation to furnish requisite process fee for issuance of notice against respondent even though the matter is slated for second time. However, keeping view the submission made by the learned counsel a week's time is granted to furnish requisite process fee, if the process fee is not paid, then the matter would be viewed seriously. If process fee is paid, Registry is directed to issue process against the respondent. List this matter next week in the usual course."
2. Till date requisite steps have not been taken for issuance of notice. In view thereof, we have no option but to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution.
HC-KAR
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN) JUDGE
RKA CT:SN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5