Karnataka High Court
WP/52985/2016 of SMT SUDHA SEETHARAM Vs SRI RAJIV VIJAYASARATHY RATNAM on 19 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010424132016 NC: 2026:KHC:51389 WP No. 52985 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO.52985 OF 2016 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT.SUDHA SEETHARAM AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010424132016
NC: 2026:KHC:51389
WP No. 52985 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO.52985 OF 2016 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT.SUDHA SEETHARAM
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
W/O SRI.S.K.SEETHARAMU
R/AT NO.48, ‘MATRU SADANAM’
10TH MAIN, 16TH CROSS
MALLESWARAM
BENGALURU – 560055
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI.ABHINAV RAMANAND A, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI.RAJIV VIJAYASARATHY RATNAM
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
S/O PROF. R.K.VIJAYASARATHY
NO.1619, ‘VAISHNAVI’
5TH B CROSS, BSK I STAGE
II BLOCK
BENGALURU – 560 050
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RAJIV VIJAYASARATHY RATNAM, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
Digitally Signed By:
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Verified
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010424132016
NC: 2026:KHC:51389
WP No. 52985 of 2016
ORDER DATED 02.09.2016 PASSED BY THE XLI ADDL. CITY
CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU IN O.S.1305/2013 AT ANNEX-J TO
W.P. AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE
PETITIONER DATED 21.07.2016 AT ANNEX-G AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the party in person/respondent have brought to the notice of this Court that the lis between the parties is given quietus by the Division Bench of this Court in MFA No.1536/2015 c/w MFA No.137/2015.
In the light of the statement made by both the parties, this petition is rendered infructuous and is, accordingly, disposed of.
(SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1 Digitally Signed By: SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM Verified