Karnataka High Court
CCC/602/2024 of SRI N G MAHADEVAIAH Vs JAYARAM N. on 19 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010335112024 NC: 2026:KHC:51547-DB CCC No. 602 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.602 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.602 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI N G MAHADEVAIAH
S/O LATE SRI GURUCHENNABASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO 43,
9TH MAIN, M C LAYOUT,
VIJAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU 560 040
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. HARISH N.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
JAYARAM N.
THE COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
KUMARAKRUPA PARK WEST,
T CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 020
…ACCUSED
(BY SRI. MURUGESH V CHARATI., ADVOCATE)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN
PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO
INITIATE
CONTEMPT
PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST
THE
RESPONDENT FOR HAVING DEISOBEYED THE ORDERS PASSED
Digitally signed by
VASANTHA
KUMARY B K
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP NO.3210/2024 (BDA) DATED
01.04.2024.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The present contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience and non-compliance of the order dated 01.04.2024 passed by the writ Court in W.P.No.3210/2024 (BDA). The operative portion of the said order would read as under:- "3. In view of the above, it would be appropriate to direct the respondents to consider the representations made by the petitioner for complying with the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.3694/2002 and as confirmed in R.F.A.No.1037/2016 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."
2. The complainant has obtained a decree in O.S.No.3694/2002 filed by him. The regular first appeal filed against the said judgment and decree by the Bangalore Development Authority has been dismissed for non-prosecution on 10.04.2023. Instead of executing the decree, the
HC-KAR
complainant/petitioner has filed the writ petition, no mandamus can be issued.
3. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that after the notice in the contempt petition has been issued, the BDA has issued an allotment letter.
4. In view thereof, no contempt is made out. We deem it appropriate to close the contempt proceedings. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice stands discharged.
5. However, if the complainant is not satisfied with the allotment letter issued by the Bangalore Development Authority, he may approach the appropriate forum, if so advised.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN) JUDGE
NG CT:SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25