Karnataka High Court
WP/3147/2026 of MR. ARIJIT BAGCHI Vs SHREYA BAGCHI on 18 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010081532026 NC: 2026:KHC:51296 WP No. 3147 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 3147 OF 2026 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: MR. ARIJIT BAGCHI S/O.SRI. SAMBHUNATH BAGCHI,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO. 3147 OF 2026 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
MR. ARIJIT BAGCHI
S/O.SRI. SAMBHUNATH BAGCHI,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/AT FLAT NO.702, BLOCK-A,
7TH FLOOR, BELVISTA UKN APARTMENTS,
HAGADUR MAIN ROAD, WHITEFIELD,
BANGALORE - 560 066.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VENKATARAMI REDDY E., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SHREYA BAGCHI
W/O. SRI. ARIJIT BAGACHI,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
R/AT.NO.1167, NEW NO.20,
5TH CROSS, NILGIRIS ROAD,
KACHARAKANAHALLI,
BANGALORE - 560 084.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. REENA MONICA, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ASIDE THE ORDER
DATED 14-01-2026 IN M.C.NO.4041/2021 PASSED BY THE
PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT BENGALURU ON MEMO
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
DATED 16-12-2025 FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN PURSUANCE
OF
THE
DIRECTION
OF
THIS
HON'BLE
COURT
IN
W.P.NO.20917/2023, DATED 30-10-2025, AS FAR AS IT
RELATES TO REJECTION OF THE MEMO DATED 16-12-2025
AND THEREBY REJECTED THE CLAIM FOR DEDUCTION AND
ADJUSTMENT MADE BY THE PETITIONER TOWARDS PAYMENT
OF INTERIM MAINTENANCE TO THE RESPONDENT VIDE
ANNEXURE-A ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This petition is of the year 2026. When this matter came up on 05.08.2026, as there was no representation on either side and this court had directed the matter to be listed under the caption for ‘dismissal’ on 28.08.2026. Even on 15.09.2026, 16.09.2026, 17.09.2026 there was no representation and the matter was directed to be listed today under the same caption.
Today i.e., 18.09.2026, when the matter came up, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In that view of
HC-KAR
the matter, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10