Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/5819/2024 of MR. ASHRAF @ ASHRAF SALMARA @ TARAKARI ASHRAF Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 18 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010315962024 NC: 2026:KHC:51201 CRL.P No. 5819 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5819 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. MR. ASHRAF @ ASHRAF SALMARA @ TARAKARI ASHRAF S/O.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5819 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
MR. ASHRAF @ ASHRAF SALMARA
@ TARAKARI ASHRAF
S/O. IDDIKUNHI,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
R/O. BENGARAKATTE SALUMARA HOUSE,
PARENKI VILLAGE,D.K.-574 214.
2.
MR. MEHRAJ
S/O. HUSAINAR,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
R/O. MADENJARU HOUSE,
MACHINA VILLAGE,
BELTHANGADY TALUK,
D.K.-574 214.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MAHAMMAD ANWAR, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY STATION HOUSE OFFICE,
PUNJALKATTE POLICE STATION,
BELTHANGADY TALUK,
REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001.
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
MAHAMMAD NAZEER
S/O. ABDUL KHADAR,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
R/O KALLAGUDDE HOUSE,
MACHINA VILLAGE,
BELTHANGADY TALUK,
DAKSHINA KANNADA,
KARNATAKA.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.PC. PRAYING TO
QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CR.NO.7/2020 DATED
15.01.2020
VIDE
ANNEXURE
A
AND
D
ALL
FURTHER
PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.1095/2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-C FOR
THE OFFENCE P/U/S 323,504 R/W 34 OF IPC PERTAINING TO
PUNJALKATTE P.S., PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE
COURT
OF
ADDL.CIVIL
JUDGE
AND
J.M.F.C
COURT
BELTHANGADY D.K.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. This Court ordered to issue notice to respondent No.2 on 11.11.2024. Despite, the petitioners have not paid process fee. As such, the matter is lying at the stage of orders since two years. It seems that the petitioners are not interested
HC-KAR
in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/-
(RAJESH RAI K)
JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7