Karnataka High Court

CRP/351/2026 of MR. SYED RAFEEQ Vs SMT. K. R. SATYAVATI on 18 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010241012026 NC: 2026:KHC:51155 CRP No. 351 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 351 OF 2026 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. MR. SYED RAFEEQ SINCE DECEASED BY

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 351 OF 2026 (IO)

BETWEEN:

1.

MR. SYED RAFEEQ

SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS

HALEEMA SADIYA,

AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS.

D/O LATE SYED RAFEEQ.

2.

SYED SHAROOQ.

AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS.

S/O LATE SYED RAFEEQ.

3.

ASIYA TARANUM

AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,

D/O LATE SYED RAFEEQ.

4.

ABEAD MAAZ,

AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,

S/O LATE SYED RAFEEQ,

5.

MRS. MUNEERA BANO.

W/O LATE SYED RAFEEQ,

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.301,

RETUL APARTMENT,

Digitally

signed by

SUVARNA T

Location:

HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

2ND FLOOR, ARMUGAM CIRCLE,

BASAVANGUDI,

BENGALURU - 560 004.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. M.S. MUKARRAM, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SMT. K. R. SATYAVATI

W/O A. S. PATTABIRAMAN,

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,

2.

SRI. A. S. PATTABIRAMAN

S/O A. B. SUBRAMANYAM.

AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,

BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.607/A,

1ST MAIN ROAD, E BLOCK,

II STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR,

BENGALURU - 560 010.

…RESPONDENTS

THIS CRP IS FILED U/S. 115 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET

ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 09.01.2026, PASSED IN OS NO.

5254/2018 ON IA NO. 9 PASSED BY THE XXV ADDITIONAL

CITY

CIVIL

AND

SESSIONS

JUDGE,

BENGALURU

VIDE

ANNEXURE

A

AND

CONSEQUENTLY

BY

DISMISS

THE

APPLICATION AND GRANT SUCH OTHER INCIDENTAL RELIEF, WHICH THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER UNDER

THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE

INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

HC-KAR

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Office has raised the objection with regard to maintainability.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to convert this Civil Revision Petition into writ petition. Accordingly, the petitioners are permitted to convert this Civil Revision Petition into writ petition within a period of two weeks from today.

3. For all statistical purposes, the civil revision petition is disposed of.

4. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed.

SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead