Karnataka High Court
RSA/2018/2023 of SRI SURAPPA Vs SMT PANKAJA on 18 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010610152023 NC: 2026:KHC:51162 RSA No. 2018 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2018 OF 2023 (PAR) BETWEEN: SRI. SURAPPA S/O LATE RANGASWAMAIH, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2018 OF 2023 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SRI. SURAPPA
S/O LATE RANGASWAMAIH,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
R/O KODIYALA VILLAGE,
CHELUR HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK,
TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 117
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MAHESH B.J, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. PANKAJA
D/O SURAPPA,
W/O MANJUNATHA,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
R/O L.G.RAMANNA LAYOUT,
LAGGERE,
BENGALURU – 560 057
2.
SMT K S MANJU
D/O SURAPPA,
W/O SIDDARAJU,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
3.
SRI RANGASWAMY
S/O SURAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS NO.2 & 3 ARE
R/O KODIYALA VILLAGE,
HC-KAR
CHELUR HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK
TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 117
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. D.GEETHA, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.08.2023 PASSED IN
RA NO.32/2021 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC, GUBBI., DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND
CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.08.2019
PASSED IN OS NO.130/2015 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GUBBI. TRIAL COURT PARTLY
DECREED THE SUIT. APPELLATE COURT DISMISSED THE
APPEAL.THE
SUIT
FOR
PARTITION
AND
SEPARATE
POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo, which reads as under: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL It is submitted that, since the dispute between the parties is settled, the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the appeal as not pressed, to meet the ends of justice.
Bengaluru
Sd/- Dated: 18.09.2026 Adv.for Appellant"
Digitally Signed by CHEPPUDIRA MONNAPPA POONACHA
HC-KAR
2. Hence, this appeal is hereby dismissed as not pressed.
(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
AKV_ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40 Digitally Signed by CHEPPUDIRA MONNAPPA POONACHA