Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/7060/2020 of SMT.VANDANA SHENOY Vs THE STATE on 18 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010362232020 NC: 2026:KHC:50995 CRL.P No. 7060 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7060 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. VANDANA SHENOY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, W/O LATE
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010362232020
NC: 2026:KHC:50995
CRL.P No. 7060 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7060 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. VANDANA SHENOY,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
W/O LATE VENKATRAMANA SHENOY,
R/AT MANDAVI EMERALD,
’C’ WING, 2ND FLOOR,
MANIPAL, UDUPI-576104.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VENKATESH SOMAREDDI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE
THROUGH THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
WOMEN’S POLICE STATION,
MANGALURU,
REPRESENTED BY THE
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU-560001.
2.
SHWETHA BHAT ALIAS
MRS. VEDIKA VARUN SHENOY,
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
W/O DR. VARUN VENKATRAMANA SHENOY
D/O VISHNUDAS BHAT
R/AT “SHREE MAHALASA NARAYANI KRIPA”
ATHIKARIBETTU POST,
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010362232020
NC: 2026:KHC:50995
CRL.P No. 7060 of 2020
MULKI-574154,
DAKSHINA KANNADA.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SUHAS GOWDA M., HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. ABHILASH VAIDYANATHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482
OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.44/2020 OF
WOMEN POLICE STATION, MANGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 498A, 504, 506 R/W SECTION
34 AND SECTION 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT ON THE FILE
OF J.M.F.C.-III COURT, MANGALURU.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Though amendment is sought in 2022, till date the learned counsel for the petitioner has not served the copy of the same on the learned counsel for respondent No.2. Hence, the petition is dismissed.
2. The records also discloses that charge-sheet is already filed and hence, liberty is given to the petitioner to challenge the same.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7