Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/7724/2024 of MS. AKSHATA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 18 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010379612024 NC: 2026:KHC:51202 CRL.P No. 7724 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7724 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. MS. AKSHATA WIFE OF MR PRAVEEN KUMAR, AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7724 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
MS. AKSHATA
WIFE OF MR PRAVEEN KUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO 181,
BHAVANI NAGRA
CHANNANAYAKANAPALYA
NAGASANDRA POST,
BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 560 073
ALSO RESIDING AT
RAJAPPA LAYOUT
JANNAPURA,
BHADRAVATHI TOWN,
SHIVAMOGGA, KARNATAKA
2.
MRS SHANTHAMMA
WIFE OF MR CHANDRACHARI,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
3.
MR KIRAN KUMAR
SON OF MR CHANDRACHARI,
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
4.
MRS RADHAMMA
WIFE OF LATE SURYACHAR,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
RAJAPPA LAYOUT,
JANNAPURA,
BHADRAVATI TOWN,
SHIVAMOGGA, KARNATAKA
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. PONNANNA M.B, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY PEENYA POLICE STATION,
PEENYA, BENGALURU -560 057
2.
MRS MAHADEVAMMA
WIFE OF MR JAYANNA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.181, BHAVANI NAGARA,
CHANNANAYAKANA PALYA,
NAGASANDRA POST,
BENGALURU, KARNATAKA-560 073
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET IN C.C.NO.20027/2023 AND ALL
OTHER PROCEEDINGS THERE UNDER PENDING ON THE FILE
OF THE LEARNED XXXI ACMM BENGALURU FOR ALLEGED
OFFENCE P/SU/ 341,323,504,506 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC 1860 AT
(ANNEXURE-C).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
HC-KAR
2. This Court ordered to issue notice to respondent No.2 on 05.03.2026. Despite, the petitioners have not paid process fee. As such, the matter is lying at the stage of orders since six months. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/-
(RAJESH RAI K)
JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 13