Karnataka High Court
WP/30096/2025 of SRI ARUN KUMAR RAMAN Vs SMT JAYASHREE CHANDIRAN on 18 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010655802025 NC: 2026:KHC:51295 WP No. 30096 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 30096 OF 2025 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI ARUN KUMAR RAMAN AGED ABOUT 43
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO. 30096 OF 2025 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI ARUN KUMAR RAMAN
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
S/O LATE MR. RAMAN N,
R/AT ABU BABAJI KANDAL,
OOTY, TAMILNADU - 643 001
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT
R/AT NO. S3, SAI NIVAS APARTMENT,
16TH CROSS, NEELADRI NAGAR
ELECTRONIC CITY PHASE - 1,
BENGALURU - 5601000
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MAHESH KUMAR K.M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. JAYASHREE CHANDIRAN
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
W/O ARUN KUMAR RAMAN
R/AT NO.109, KUPPUSAMY NILAYAM,
3RD MAIN, HOYASALA NAGAR
HORAMAVU
BENGALURU - 560 016
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. ANILTHOMAS, ADVOCATE FOR C/R)
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS
WP
IS
FILED
UNDER
ARTICLE
THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
CERTIORARI OR ORDER OR DIRECTION TO SET OF ASIDE THE
IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.09.2025 PASSED BY THE
HON'BLE 1 ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT
BENGALURU ON 1 A NO. II IN G AND WC NO.427/2024
PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE D OF THIS WRIT PETITION.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This writ petition is of the year 2025. When this matter came up on 15.09.2026, as there was no representation on either side and this court had directed the matter to be listed under the caption for ‘dismissal’ on 16.09.2026. Even on 16.09.2026 and 17.09.2026 there was no representation and the matter was directed to be listed today under the same caption.
Today i.e., 18.09.2026, when the matter came up, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In that view of
HC-KAR
the matter, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9