Karnataka High Court
RFA/1178/2020 of SMT. G P MANGALA ARUN Vs THE MANAGER, on 18 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010247882020 NC: 2026:KHC:51011 RFA No. 1178 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1178 OF 2020 (INJ) BETWEEN: SMT. G.P.MANGALA ARUN, W/O ARUN KUMAR, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1178 OF 2020 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
SMT. G.P.MANGALA ARUN,
W/O ARUN KUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/AT NO.2610, 1ST FLOOR,
26TH MAIN, 38TH B CROSS,
9TH BLOCK, JAYANAGARA,
BENGALURU-560 069.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. PRASHANTH H.S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE MANAGER,
THE BHAVASRAKSHATRIYA
CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,
NO.63/67, SHANKARASADANA,
24TH CROSS, KILARI ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 053.
2.
SMT.SANDHYA SRIKANTH
AGED MAJOR,
(AGE NOT KNOWN TO APPELLANT)
R/AT NO.12/6,
SRI.SUBRAMANYA NILAYA,
4TH MAIN ROAD,
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
RAGHAVENDRA BLOCK,
GIRINAGARA WARD NO.162,
BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE,
BENGALURU 560 050.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.SAILESH S.K., ADVOCATE FOR R-1;
SRI. SUNDAR RAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 16.06.2020
PASSED BY THE LEARNED XX ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, BANGALORE ON I.A.NO.3 IN O.S.NO.3050/2019 AND
FURTHER BE PLEASED TO DISMISS I.A.NO.3 FILED BY THE
2ND RESPONDENT HEREIN, UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11 OF
CPC AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The memo reads as under: "That the Appellant has already cleared the entire dues of the 1st Respondent and in view of clearance of loan, the 2nd Respondent has already executed a registered Sale Deed in favour of the Appellant,
HC-KAR
concerning the Schedule Property. As such the Appellant does not wish to prosecute the above Regular First Appeal as the dispute is already settled among the parties. Hence the above Regular First Appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity."
Placing reliance on the memo, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
GPG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9