Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/8494/2024 of MANGALAMMA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 18 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010424872024 NC: 2026:KHC:51203 CRL.P No. 8494 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8494 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. MANGALAMMA W/O LATE BASAVARAJ, AGED 69 YEARS, R/AT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8494 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
MANGALAMMA
W/O LATE BASAVARAJ,
AGED 69 YEARS,
R/AT KOMMASANDRA VILLAGE,
DOMMASANDRA POST,
SARJAPURA HOBLI,
ANEKAL TALUK 562 125
2.
RUDRESH B
S/O LATE BASAVARAJ,
AGED 46 YEARS,
R/AT KOMMASANDRA VILLAGE,
DOMMASANDRA POST,
SARJAPURA HOBLI,
ANEKAL TALUK 562125
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR C, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
HEBBAGODI POLICE STATION,
ANEKAL SUB DIVISION,
BENGALURU DISTRICT,
REPTD BY STATE PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR/GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BANGALORE 560 001
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
KUMUDHA R
W/O RAMAKRISHNAN,
AGED 55 YEARS,
R/AT MEENAKSHI MANNER
APARTMENT, ARUNACHALAM
CROSS ROAD, KK PUDUR,
COIMBATORE,
TAMIL NADU-628 905
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.305/2024
FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE, PENDING ON THE
FILE OF THE HONOURABLE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT AT ANEKAL, AGAINST THE
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.3 AND 4 FOR THE OFFENCES
P/U/S 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 OF IPC, 1860.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. This Court ordered to issue notice to respondent No.2 on 24.09.2024. Despite, the petitioners have not paid process fee. As such, the matter is lying at the stage of orders since two years. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the
HC-KAR
petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 16