Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/265/2024 of SRI. NAGARAJA K Vs STATE BY BENGALURU RURAL on 18 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010009362024 NC: 2026:KHC:51198 CRL.P No. 265 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 265 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. NAGARAJA K S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 48
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 265 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. NAGARAJA K
S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
R/AT 101, A.K COLONY,
GUDDADAHALLI, R.T NAGAR,
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK,
BENGALURU-560 032
2.
SRI. NARAYANA
S/O THIMMARAYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
R/AT 5TH CROSS,
SHANBHULINGESHWARA LAYOUT,
CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI
RT NAGARA POST,
BENGALURU-560 032.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
STATE BY BENGALURU RURAL
POLICE STATION, DODDABALLAPURA
RURAL POLICE STATION
BENGALURU DISTRICT
REP. BY ITS S.P.P
HIGH COURT, BANGALORE-560 001.
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
SMT. NEELAMMA
W/O LATE G PRAKASH,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
PALANAJOGANAHALLI,
KASABA HOBLI,
DODDABALLAPURA TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO
QUASH
THE
ENTIRE
CRIMINAL
PROCEEDINGS
IN
C.C.NO.5845/2023
ARISING
OUT
OF
CR.NO.141/2022
REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDNET NO.1 DODDABALLAPURA
RURAL POLICE FOR OFFENCE P/U/S 323, 324, 504, 506, 427
OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND
JMFC, DODDABALLAPURA.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. This Court ordered to issue notice to respondent No.2 on 27.01.2026. Despite, the petitioners have not paid process fee. As such, the matter is lying at the stage of orders since seven months. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other
HC-KAR
option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1