Karnataka High Court
WP/26163/2022 of SRI MANIMARAN K Vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE CAR on 18 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010604272022 NC: 2026:KHC:51099-DB WP No. 26163 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 26163 OF 2022 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN:
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
WRIT PETITION NO. 26163 OF 2022 (S-KSAT)
BETWEEN:
SRI MANIMARAN K
S/O LATE KANAN
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
NO.2, 3RD CROSS,
SUMANGALI SEVASHRAMA
CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI
BENGALURU - 560024
RETIRED AS ASSISTANT RESERVE
SUB INSPECTOR
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
OF POLICE, CAR, HEAD QUARTERS
MYSORE ROAD
BENGALURU- 560018.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S SRINIVASA, ADV. FOR
SRI DANAPPA P. PANIBHATE, ADV.)
AND:
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
CAR, HEAD QUARTERS
MYSORE ROAD
BENGALURU - 560018.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. S C DESHMUKH, AGA)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) ISSUE WRIT IN THE
NATURE
OF
CERTIORARI
OR
MANDAMUS
OR
ANY
OTHER
DIRECTIONS TO THE RESPONDENTS; B) QUASH THE IMPUGNED
Digitally signed by
NANJUNDACHARI
Location: High
Court of Karnataka
HC-KAR
ORDER DATED 23/11/2022 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA STATE
ADMINISTRATIVE
TRIBUNAL,
BENGALURU
IN
APPLICATION
NO.123/2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN
‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
AND
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT)
Heard learned counsel Sri.S.Srinivasa for Sri.Danappa P. Panibhate, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate Sri.S.C.Deshmukh for the respondent.
2. At the outset, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent would submit that in terms of the impugned order dated 23.11.20202 in Application No.123/2022 passed by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal at Bengaluru (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) the Application of the petitioner is considered
HC-KAR
and pensionary benefits are sanctioned and released to the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would not dispute the release of pensionary benefits.
4. Placing the submission of learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent, the above writ petition stands disposed of. However, it is made clear that, if any benefits are still due to the petitioner, it is open for the petitioner to make a fresh representation.
Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE
Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE
NC CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19