Karnataka High Court
RP/453/2025 of SRI PRAVEEN R Vs ROOPA B K on 18 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010675502025 NC: 2026:KHC:51160 RP No. 453 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REVIEW PETITION NO. 453 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI PRAVEEN R S/O RAVI KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010675502025
NC: 2026:KHC:51160
RP No. 453 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
REVIEW PETITION NO. 453 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
SRI PRAVEEN R
S/O RAVI KUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/AT NO.844, 23RD A CROSS,
22ND MAIN ROAD, SECTOR-2,
HSR LAYOUT,
BENGALURU - 560 102.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. ROOPA B.K.
D/O KANTHARAJ,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
R/AT NO.23, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND CROSS,
SHANTI NIVAS LAOUT,
KENGERI SATELLITE TOWN
BENGALURU - 560 060.
ALSO RESIDING AT
NO. 1413, SEETHA RESIDENCY,
12TH CROSS, 1ST D MAIN,
BDA LAYOUT,
KENGERI SATELLITE TOWN,
BENGALURU - 560 060.
…RESPONDENT
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010675502025
NC: 2026:KHC:51160
RP No. 453 of 2025
THIS RP IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 R/W
SEC.114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED
22.09.2025 PASSED IN WP NO.6956/2025 (GM-FC) BY
SUBSTITUTING THE SENTENCE EX NO.116/2023 DATED
7.12.2025, IN THE PLACE OF EX. PETITION NO.200/2016 AS
TYPED IN THE ORDER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the petition has become Infructuous.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed as Infructuous.
4. Pending I.As., if any, in this petition shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33