Karnataka High Court

MFA/6744/2022 of UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs UMESH on 18 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010447972022 NC: 2026:KHC:50939 MFA No. 6744 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6744 OF 2022 (MV-I) BETWEEN: UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6744 OF 2022 (MV-I)

BETWEEN:

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE

COMPANY LIMITED,

BRANCH OFFICE: PRABHU BUILDING,

OPP. ARUNA TALKIES MAIN ROAD,

PUTTUR TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT.

NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS

REGIONAL OFFICE,

6TH FLOOR, KRUSHI BHAVAN,

HUDSON CIRCLE, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,

BANGALORE – 560 001.

REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. L. SREEKANTA RAO., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

UMESH,

S/O SHEENA MOOLYA,

AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,

R/A PRATHAP NAGARA HOUSE,

KADESHIVALAYA POST AND

VILLAGE, BANTWALA TALUK,

D. K. DISTRICT – 574 325.

Digitally

signed by

SUSHMA

LAKSHMI B

S

Location:

High Court

of Karnataka

HC-KAR

2.

ABDUL RAHIMAN,

S/O ABBAS BYARI,

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

R/A GADIYARU HOUSE,

SWAGATH NAGAR,

KEDILA VILLAGE,

PERAMOGARU POST,

PUTTUR TALUK,

D. K. DISTRICT – 574 220.

…RESPONDENTS

(R2 SERVED AND UNEPRESENTED)

----

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 16.03.2022, PASSED IN

MVC.NO.1431/2018, ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MEMBER, ADDITIONAL

M.A.C.T.-XI AT D.K, MANGALURU, SITTING AT PUTTUR, D.K., PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION

AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

HC-KAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

Case is called out. None appears for the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested to proceed with the case. Therefore, it is appropriate to dismiss the appeal for non- prosecution.

2. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

NR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead