Karnataka High Court
MFA/6744/2022 of UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs UMESH on 18 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010447972022 NC: 2026:KHC:50939 MFA No. 6744 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6744 OF 2022 (MV-I) BETWEEN: UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6744 OF 2022 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE
COMPANY LIMITED,
BRANCH OFFICE: PRABHU BUILDING,
OPP. ARUNA TALKIES MAIN ROAD,
PUTTUR TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT.
NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS
REGIONAL OFFICE,
6TH FLOOR, KRUSHI BHAVAN,
HUDSON CIRCLE, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BANGALORE – 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. L. SREEKANTA RAO., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
UMESH,
S/O SHEENA MOOLYA,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
R/A PRATHAP NAGARA HOUSE,
KADESHIVALAYA POST AND
VILLAGE, BANTWALA TALUK,
D. K. DISTRICT – 574 325.
Digitally
signed by
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI B
S
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
2.
ABDUL RAHIMAN,
S/O ABBAS BYARI,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/A GADIYARU HOUSE,
SWAGATH NAGAR,
KEDILA VILLAGE,
PERAMOGARU POST,
PUTTUR TALUK,
D. K. DISTRICT – 574 220.
…RESPONDENTS
(R2 SERVED AND UNEPRESENTED)
----
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 16.03.2022, PASSED IN
MVC.NO.1431/2018, ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MEMBER, ADDITIONAL
M.A.C.T.-XI AT D.K, MANGALURU, SITTING AT PUTTUR, D.K., PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION
AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Case is called out. None appears for the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested to proceed with the case. Therefore, it is appropriate to dismiss the appeal for non- prosecution.
2. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
NR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6