Karnataka High Court
RFA/1785/2026 of SRI. B SELVARAJ Vs SRI. A MARIYAPPA on 17 September 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:33199 MFA No. 7668 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7668 OF 2024 (CPC) BETWEEN: SRI B. SELVARAJ S/O. LATE BALASWAMY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7668 OF 2024 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI B. SELVARAJ
S/O. LATE BALASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
R/AT NO.6, 1ST CROSS
CHINNAPPA LAYOUT
KAMMANAHALLI MAIN ROAD
ST. THOMAS TOWN POST
BENGALURU - 560 049.
CURRENTLY RESIDING IN GEORGIA
REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER
MR. JOHNSON P, S/O. PAPPACHAN
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
R/AT NO.617, MES ROD
BAHUBALINAGAR
BENGALURU NORTH
BENGALURU - 560 013.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI RAMACHANDRA G. BHAT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI A. MARIYAPPA
S/O. LATE SRI ANNAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
R/AT BASAVANAPUR VILLAGE
VIRGONAGAR POST
BENGALURU - 560 049.
2.
SRI THOMAS BALASWAMY
S/O. LATE BALASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
R/AT NO.8, 7TH CROSS
Digitally signed
by
GAVRIBIDANUR
SUBRAMANYA
GUPTA
SREENATH
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
SIDDARTHA SCHOOL ROAD
LINGARAJAPURAM
ST. THOMAS TOWN POST
BENGALURU - 560 084.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLIII RULE 1 OF THE
CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 29.06.2024
PASSED IN MISC.NO.25154/2018 BY XXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY
CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE, MAYO HALL, BENGALURU.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellant files a memo seeking conversion of this appeal, which reads as under: "The appellant may kindly be permitted to convert the above appeal as R.F.A., in the ends of justice."
2. The said memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the memo, the appellant is permitted to convert this appeal into Regular First Appeal (RFA) in accordance with law.
HC-KAR
Accordingly, the appeal is disposed off for statistical purposes.
Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE
CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5