Karnataka High Court
CRP/825/2026 of SRI ARUN SHARMA Vs SRI B N MURALIDHAR on 17 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010640012026 NC: 2026:KHC:50838 CRP No. 825 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 825 OF 2026 (IO) BETWEEN: SRI ARUN SHARMA S/O R.P SHARMA AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 825 OF 2026 (IO)
BETWEEN:
SRI ARUN SHARMA
S/O R.P SHARMA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
RESIDING AT 50, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
3RD CROSS, BELLARY ROAD,
DENA BANK COLONY, GANGA NAGARA,
R.T. NAGARA,
BENGALURU NORTH – 560 032
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SANJAY KUMAR A., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI B.N.MURALIDHAR
S/O B.N.NAGARAJ,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
RESIDING AT VEERESHWARA NILAYA,
GROUND FLOOR, 4TH CROSS,
SINGANAYAKANAHALLI POST,
BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, NAGENAHALLLI,
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK
BENGALURU – 560 054
2.
SMT. B.V. YASHODA
W/O B.N. MURALIDHAR,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
RESIDING AT VEERESHWARA NILAYA,
GROUND FLOOR, 4TH CROSS,
SINGANAYAKANAHALLI POST,
BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, NAGENAHALLLI,
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK
BENGALURU – 560 054
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRP FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE
ORDER DATED 04.06.2026 PASSED ON IA NO.1 IN OS
NO.324/2026 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-2), BENGALURU CITY., REJECTING THE
IA NO.1 FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULES 1 AND 2 OF CPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The present Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning order dated 04.06.2026 passed on I.A.No.1 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC in O.S.No.324/2026 by I Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge at Bengaluru. The office has raised an objection regarding maintainability.
2. A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an appropriate petition. The memo is taken on record. In view of the matter, this Court is passing the following:
HC-KAR
ORDER
i. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, giving liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate petition. ii. The petitioner shall have the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act from 09.09.2026 till ten days from the date of receipt of the copy of the order. iii. The registry is directed to return all the documents by retaining the xerox copies. iv. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
PKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17 *MR