Karnataka High Court
RFA/832/2025 of SMT. LATE VINDHYA B N REDDY Vs SMT. HOODI KRISHNA REDDY CHANCHALA DEVI on 17 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010217382025 NC: 2026:KHC:50908 RFA No. 832 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 832 OF 2025 (DEC/PAR) BETWEEN: 1. ( a ). SMT. LATE VINDHYA B N
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 832 OF 2025 (DEC/PAR)
BETWEEN:
1.
(a).
SMT. LATE VINDHYA B N REDDY
SINCE DEAD THROUGH LRS.
SRI VIRAM SHIVANNA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
(b).
VIHAAN VIKRAM REDDY
S/O VIKRAM SHIVANNA
AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS OLD
(C).
AGASTYA VINDHYA REDDY
S/O VIKRA SHIVANNA
AGED ABOUT 6 MONTHS OLD
ALL PERMANENTLY R/AT
GRIHA UDYAAN-2,
NO.402, KANAKASHREE LAYOUT,
KANNUR,
BANGALORE – 562 149.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. NIDHI M. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. HOODI KRISHNA REDDY CHANCHALA DEVI
W/O LATE B A NARAYANA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
Digitally
signed by
MADHURI S
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
SMT. VINAYA B N REDDY
D/O B A NARAYANA REDDY
W/O SATNOSH B
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
BOTH ARE R/AT
NO. 420/422, 5TH CROSS,
3RD ‘B’ MAIN, 3RD BLOCK,
NEAR FOOD WORLD KALYAN NAGAR,
BENGALURU – 560 043.
3.
SANTOSH B
S/O BALASUBRAMANYA
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
R/AT NO. 420/422,
5TH CROSS, 3RD B MAIN,
3RD BLOCK, NEAR FOOD WORLD
KALYAN NAGAR,
BENGALURU – 560 043.
4.
THE CHIEF MANAGER ICICI BANK LTD.,
NO.1 SHOBHA PEARL
COMMISSARIAT ROAD, ASHOK NAGAR
BENGALURU – 560 025.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.03.2025 PASSED ON
OS NO.26382/2023 ON THE FILE OF 74TH ADDITIONAL CITY
CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL UNIT, CITY CIVIL
COURT, BENGALURU (CCH 75) AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal stating that the parties have amicably settled the disputes between them.
In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE
KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5