Karnataka High Court
CCC/312/2026 of SRI NARASIMHAIAH Vs MAJOR MANIVANNAN P on 17 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010184552026 NC: 2026:KHC:50852-DB CCC No. 312 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 312 OF 2026
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 312 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
SRI NARASHIMHAIAH,
S/O CHIKKARASAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
R/AT NO.781, 4TH BLOCK,
'D' GROUP EMPLOYEES LAYOUT,
ANDRAHALLI MAIN ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 091.
…COMPLAINANT
[BY SRI.ROOPESHA.B., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)]
AND:
1.
MAJOR MANIVANNAN.P,
THE COMMISSIONER,
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
5TH MAIN ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST,
GUTTAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 020.
2.
SREEROOPA,
THE DEPUTY 1 SECRETARY-3,
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
5TH MAIN ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST,
GUTTAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 020.
…ACCUSED
[BY SRI.KARTHIKEYAN.B.S., ADVOCATE FOR A1 & A2]
THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS
11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, R/W ARTICLE 215 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT PRAYING TO
INITIATE THE APPROPRIATE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED
Digitally
signed by K G
RENUKAMBA
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
FOR NON COMPLIANCE AND DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER PASSED
BY THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 16.09.2025 IN W.P.NO.20856/2025
(BDA) AND IN NON-CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION DATED
28.10.2025, WHICH IS PENDING IN THE OFFICE OF THE ACCUSED.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
A memo is filed on 08.09.2026 by the counsel for the accused stating that the affidavit of compliance dated 17.08.2026 in respect of compliance of the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.20856/2025, wherein Bangalore Development Authority1 has undertaken to execute a sale deed within 10 days. It is stated that, accordingly the sale deed has been executed by the concerned officer of the BDA and the original of the same has been handed over to the complainant.
No one appears for the complainant.
A document purporting to be the sale deed is enclosed with this memo. In this view of the matter, the contempt 1 BDA
HC-KAR
petition is consigned. However, in case there is any discrepancy in the sale deed, it would be open for the complainant to revive this contempt case within a period of 30 days from today.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE
KGR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46