Karnataka High Court
CRP/816/2026 of SRI. MUNIRAJU Vs SRI. JAGADISHWARA on 17 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010632642026 NC: 2026:KHC:50702 CRP No. 816 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 816 OF 2026 (IO) BETWEEN: SRI. MUNIRAJU S/O LATE VENKATARAYAPPA
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 816 OF 2026 (IO)
BETWEEN:
SRI. MUNIRAJU
S/O LATE VENKATARAYAPPA ALIAS
CHIKKAVENKATARAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
R/AT KATHIHOSAHALLI VILLAGE
DODDABELAVANGALA HOBLI
DODDABALAPUR TALUK
BANGALURU RURAL DISTRICT
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAMESHA B.N.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. JAGADISHWARA
S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
2.
SRI. DEVARAJ
S/O LATE NANJEGOWDA
AGED BOUT 41 YEARS
3.
SMT. BHARATHI
W/O NANJEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
4.
SRI. SUMANTHA
S/O LATE NANJEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 4 ARE
R/AT CHENNAPURA VILLAGE
TUBHAGERE HOBLI
DODDABALAPUR TALUK
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT
5.
SRI. NARAYANAPPA
S/O LATE DODDAVENKATARAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
6.
SMT. MUNICHENNAMMA
W/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
7.
SMT. LAKSHMAMMA
D/O LATE DODDAVENKATARAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
R5 TO R7 ARE RESIDING AT
CHENNAPURA VILLAGE
TUBHAGERE HOBLI
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRP IS FILED U/S. 115 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 04.07.2026, ALLOWING IA IN OS
NO. 152/2026 ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE COURT
ADDITIONAL
SENIOR
CIVIL
JUDGE
AND
JMFC,
AT
DODDABALLAPURA
(ANNEXURE
A)
AND
REJECT
THE
APPLICATION AND ALLOW THE PLAINT.
HC-KAR
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The present Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning order dated 04.07.2026 passed in OS.No.152/2021 under Order VII Rule 11 (a)(b) and (d) of CPC, on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC., Doddaballapura, whereby the application stands allowed in part. The plaint stands rejected as having no cause and being barred by law. Office is directed to draw decree accordingly.
2. The office has taken an objection with regard to maintainability under Section 115 of CPC. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The impugned order is passed on 04.07.2026 and the CRP is filed on 07.09.2026. Accordingly, this Court is passing the following:
ORDER
i. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, giving liberty
HC-KAR
to the petitioner to file an appropriate petition. ii. The petitioner shall have the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act from 17.09.2026 till 05.10.2026. iii. The registry is directed to return all the documents by retaining the xerox copies. iv. Pending IAs., if any, in the petition shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16 *AK