Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/6241/2020 of SRI SAMPATH KUMAR B V @ MANI Vs SMT SOWBHAGYA @ BHAGYA N on 16 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010338452020 NC: 2026:KHC:50310 CRL.P No. 6241 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6241 OF 2020 BETWEEN: SRI SAMPATH KUMAR B V @ MANI S/O SRI. VENKATAPPA AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6241 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
SRI SAMPATH KUMAR B V @ MANI
S/O SRI. VENKATAPPA
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/O BAGUDINAHALLI VILLAGE
NARASIPURA POST
SOMPURA HOBLI
NELAMANGALA TALUK
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562111
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SRINIVAS A R, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. SOWBHAGYA @ BHAGYA N
W/O SRI. SAMPATH KUMAR B V @ MANI
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
R/AT NO.149, BINNAMANGALA
ARASHINEKUNTE POST
NELAMANGALA TALUK
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562123
2.
SRI. PUNITH KUMAR
S/O. SRI. SAMPATH KUMAR B V @ MANI
AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS
SINCE MINOR
REP BY RESPONDENT NO.1
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
R/AT NO.149, BINNAMANGALA
ARASHINEKUNTE POST
NELAMANGALA TALUK
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562123
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI CHANNEGOWDA K G, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ORDER DATED 01.06.2018 ISSUING NOTICE
AGAINST THE PETITIONER/RESPONDENT OF THE PETITION
UNDER SECTION 12 R/W 17, 18, 20, 21 AND 22 OF THE
PROTECTION WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT AS PER
ANNEXURE-A FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 2 AND
ETC.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
REPORTING
SETTLEMENT, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo stating that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties before the Lok-Adalath conducted before
HC-KAR
the Trial Court. In view of the settlement arrived between the parties, the petition does not survive for adjudication. Hence, prays this Court to dismiss the petition as infrucutous. The said memo is taken on record. In view of the said memo, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN