Karnataka High Court
WP/22667/2026 of MR. SANTHOSH M T Vs SMT. NANDINI M S @ NANDINI A G @NISHA, on 16 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010497032026 NC: 2026:KHC:50460 WP No. 22667 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 22667 OF 2026 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: MR. SANTHOSH M.T., AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010497032026
NC: 2026:KHC:50460
WP No. 22667 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO. 22667 OF 2026 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
MR. SANTHOSH M.T.,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
S/O M.C. MITTU THIMMAIAH,
R/O HOUSE NO.129,
NEAR KUTTANDI POST OFFICE
PONNAMPET TQ.,
KODAGU DISTRICT-571 218
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RANJAN KUMAR K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. NANDINI M.S.@
NANDINI A.G@NISHA,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
W/O SANTHOSH M.T.,
D/O LATE A.U. GANAPATHY,
R/AT HODDURU VILLAGE AND POST -617 836
MADIKERI TQ, KODAGU DISTRICT
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.V.SRINIVAS, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR
DIRECTION, QUASHING AND SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER
DATED 04.07.2026 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY
COURT, KODAGU, AT MADIKERI, ON I.A. NO.2 IN G & WC
NO.06/2026 (ANNEXURE-E).
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010497032026
NC: 2026:KHC:50460
WP No. 22667 of 2026
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that they have already complied with the order passed by the Family Court on 04.07.2026 and have decided to hand over the custody of the minor child to the respondent. In view of the same, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition.
2. The memo is taken on record.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
3. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE PKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 64