Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/13441/2024 of VARUN RAJ Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 16 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010694022024 NC: 2026:KHC:50622 CRL.P No. 13441 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13441 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. VARUN RAJ S/O. RAJU N ACHARYA AGED ABOUT 38
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13441 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
VARUN RAJ
S/O. RAJU N ACHARYA
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 371, 2ND FLOOR,
RATHNA MAHAL, 9TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD,
BDA LAYOUT, AVALAHALLI, GIRINAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 085.
2.
SMT. SHARADA RAJU
W/O. RAJU N ACHARYA,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 2-35-B1-A "SURABHI"
BEHIND KODAVOOR CA BANK,
OPP PETROL PUMP,
SANTHEKATTE, UDUPI-576 105.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ANIL SHEKAR K.S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY GIRINAGAR POLICE STATION,
BANGALORE -560 085
REPRESENTED BY THE
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU-560 001
Digitally signed by
PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
SMT. VIJETHA
W/O VARUN RAJ,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
NO. 371, 2ND FLOOR,
RATHNA MAHAL 9TH CROSS,
1ST MAIN ROAD, BDA LAYOUT,
AVALAHALLI, GIRINAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 085
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1,
SRI. ASHOK KUMAR SHETTY.K, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR NO.414/2024 UNDER
SEC.3(5),85 OF BNS 2023 AND SEC.3,4 OF D.P ACT
REGISTERED BY THE GIRINAGAR P.S WHICH IS PENDING ON
THE FILE OF THE 37TH ADDL.C.M.M COURT BENGALURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that subsequent to filing of this petition, respondent No.1-Police have filed charge sheet against the petitioners. As such, the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the petition reserving
HC-KAR
liberty to them to file a fresh petition challenging the charge sheet.
2. In view of the above submission, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn reserving liberty as sought for.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
PKS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39