Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/2453/2024 of SMT. ANANTHAMMA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA S H O on 16 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010146252024 NC: 2026:KHC:50619 CRL.P No. 2453 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2453 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ANANTHAMMA WIFE OF THIPPESWAMY, AGED ABOUT 58

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2453 OF 2024

BETWEEN:

1.

SMT. ANANTHAMMA

WIFE OF THIPPESWAMY,

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,

RESIDING AT VITTALA NAGAR,

2.

SRI THIPPESWAMY

SON OF LATE THIPPAIAH

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,

RESIDING AT VITTALA NAGAR,

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. FAYAZ SAB B.G, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA S.H.O

WOMEN POLICE STATION

SHIVAMOGGA,

SHIVAMOGGA SUB-DIVISION,

SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577 201

REPRESENTED BY

STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

BENGALURU 560 001

Digitally signed

by PANKAJA S

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

2.

SMT. TULASI

WIFE OF RUDRAMUNI,

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,

RESIDING AT VITTAL NAGAR,

NEAR WATER FILTER,

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1,

SMT. BHUSHANI KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO

QUASH

THE

IMPUGNED

ACT

ON

THE

PART

OF

THE

RESPONDENT NO.1 ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS REGISTRATION OF

FIR IN CR.NO.52/2021 IN C.C.NO.1077/2022 FOR THE

OFFENCE P/U/S 498A R/W 34 OF IPC AND SEC. 3 AND 4 OF

DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT 1961 AND THE SAME IS PENDING

ON THE FILE OF J.M.F.C. - II COURT, SHIVAMOGGA AS

ILLEGAL,

ARBITRARY,

DISCRIMINATORY

AND

WITHOUT

APPLICATION OF MIND AGAINST THE PETITIONER, WHICH IS

PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A AS FOR AS

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 AND 3 ARE CONCERNED.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.

2. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that, since the trial has already been commenced before the Trial Court, the petition does not survive for consideration.

HC-KAR

3. In view of the submission, the petition is dismissed.

SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE

HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead