Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/2453/2024 of SMT. ANANTHAMMA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA S H O on 16 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010146252024 NC: 2026:KHC:50619 CRL.P No. 2453 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2453 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ANANTHAMMA WIFE OF THIPPESWAMY, AGED ABOUT 58
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2453 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. ANANTHAMMA
WIFE OF THIPPESWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
RESIDING AT VITTALA NAGAR,
2.
SRI THIPPESWAMY
SON OF LATE THIPPAIAH
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
RESIDING AT VITTALA NAGAR,
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. FAYAZ SAB B.G, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA S.H.O
WOMEN POLICE STATION
SHIVAMOGGA,
SHIVAMOGGA SUB-DIVISION,
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577 201
REPRESENTED BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU 560 001
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
SMT. TULASI
WIFE OF RUDRAMUNI,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
RESIDING AT VITTAL NAGAR,
NEAR WATER FILTER,
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1,
SMT. BHUSHANI KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH
THE
IMPUGNED
ACT
ON
THE
PART
OF
THE
RESPONDENT NO.1 ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS REGISTRATION OF
FIR IN CR.NO.52/2021 IN C.C.NO.1077/2022 FOR THE
OFFENCE P/U/S 498A R/W 34 OF IPC AND SEC. 3 AND 4 OF
DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT 1961 AND THE SAME IS PENDING
ON THE FILE OF J.M.F.C. - II COURT, SHIVAMOGGA AS
ILLEGAL,
ARBITRARY,
DISCRIMINATORY
AND
WITHOUT
APPLICATION OF MIND AGAINST THE PETITIONER, WHICH IS
PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A AS FOR AS
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 AND 3 ARE CONCERNED.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that, since the trial has already been commenced before the Trial Court, the petition does not survive for consideration.
HC-KAR
3. In view of the submission, the petition is dismissed.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18