Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/1127/2024 of IMTHIYAZ ABOOBAKKAR Vs M/S PNB HOUSING FINANCE LTD on 16 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010062752024 NC: 2026:KHC:50431 CRL.P No. 1127 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1127 OF 2024 BETWEEN: IMTHIYAZ ABOOBAKKAR PROPRIETOR OF FALCON SEA FOOD SON
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1127 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
IMTHIYAZ ABOOBAKKAR
PROPRIETOR OF FALCON SEA FOOD
SON OF LATE B S ABOOBAKAR
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
RESIDING AT 304
3RD FLOOR
DIAMOND CITY PEARL BLOCK,
MARMARNAMIKATTE, JEPPU,
ATTAVARA,
MANGALORE,
D K DIST 575001
ALSO AT
IMTHIYA ABBOBAKKAR FOR FALCON SEA FOOD
M/S FALCON SEA FOOD,
REGAL PARK BUILDING, MISSION STREET
MANGALORE
D.K.575 001
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. LEELESH KRISHNA.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S PNB HOUSING FINANCE LTD.,
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT
PRESTIGE EMERALD BUILDING,
3RD FLOOR, LAVELLE ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
Digitally signed by
PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED
REPRESENTAIVE
MR. PRADEEP S
S/O SHANMUGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH
THE
COMPLIANT
(ANNEXURE
A)
AND
ENTIRE
PROCEEDINGS
(ANNEXURE
B)
IN
C.C.NO.18790/2022
PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE XXVI ACMM AT BENGALURU
CALLED BEFORE CONCURRENT CHARGE COURT XII ACMM, BENGALURU FOR OFFENCE P/US.138 OF NI ACT 1881.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The matter was listed yesterday i.e., on 15.09.2026 and there was no representation for the petitioner. As such, the matter was posted today for dismissal. Despite, there is no representation for the petitioner even today.
2. Since the petition is of the year 2024, it could be presumed that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
HC-KAR
3. Registry is directed to intimate the order of dismissal to the concerned Trial Court. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
CR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3