Karnataka High Court

CRL.A/2154/2025 of SRI C NAGAVENDRA Vs ASMATEX GARMENTS on 16 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010456592025 NC: 2026:KHC:50417 CRL.A No. 2154 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2154 OF 2025 ( A ) BETWEEN: 1. SRI C NAGAVENDRA S/O SRI K CHAMARAJ, AGED

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2154 OF 2025 (A)

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI C NAGAVENDRA

S/O SRI K CHAMARAJ,

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

R/AT NO. 11/1, AKRUTHI NILAYA,

PARVATHI NAGAR,

MEDAHALLI, KITHAGANURU MAIN ROAD,

VIRGONAGAR POST, BENGALURU-560049

…APPELLANT

(BY MS. SHAILA H.S., ADV. FOR SRI. RAMESH GOWDA M. K., ADV.)

AND:

1.

ASMATEX GARMENTS

MANUFACTURES OF READYMADE GARMENTS,

SITUATED NO.64A, KIADB,

KARUR INDUSTRIAL AREA,

NEAR NEW D C OFFICE,

P B ROAD, DAVANAGERE-577006

REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR,

MR SHEIK HAFEEZULLA KHAN.

2.

MR SHEIK HAFEEZULLA KHAN

AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,

PROPRIETOR OF ASMATEX GARMENTS,

MANUFACTURES OF READYMADE GARMENTS,

SITUATED NO.64A, KIADB,

KARUR INDUSTRIAL AREA,

NEAR NEW D C OFFICE,

P B ROAD, DAVANAGERE-577006

…RESPONDENTS

(V/O

DTD:

16.09.2026

NOTICE

TO

RESPONDENTS

IS

DISPENSED WITH)

Digitally signed by

LAKSHMINARAYAN N

Location: High Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

CRL.A FILED U/S 378(4) CR.PC (FILED U/S 419(4) OF

BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING THAT

THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THIS

APPEAL AND THEREBY SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED

02.04.2025 PASSED BY IN THE COURT OF XII ADDL.SMALL

CAUSES

JUDGE

AND

ADDL.CMM

AT

BENGALURU

IN

C.C.NO.6059/2019 AND RESTORE THE ABOVE CASE AND

PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO PROCEED/PROSECUTE WITH THE

AFORESAID CASE ON MERITS.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS

DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. The appellant/complainant has preferred this appeal against the order dated 02.04.2025 passed in CC.No.6059/2019 by the XII Addl. Small Causes Judge and ACMM, Bengaluru (for short, 'the Trial Court') and restored the appeal in CC.No.6059/2019.

2. Heard the arguments of the appellant. The complainant has filed a complaint under Section 138 of NI Act. Same was registered in PCR No.4792/2019. After taking cognizance, case was registered in CC.No.6059/2019 and summons was duly served to the

HC-KAR

accused. However, accused did not appear before the Court. Hence, NBW was issued against the accused from time to time till 02.04.2025. On 02.04.2025, the Trial Court has passed the following order:

"Case called out at 5.15 PM. Sufficient time already granted from 06-03-2023 Inspite of repeated issuance of summons, the complainant is not taking steps to secure the accused persons and PF is also not paid.

This attitude of complainant shows that he has not interested to prosecute the case. Hence Case of the complainant is here by dismissed for default."

3. The order sheet reveals that, NBW issued against the accused was not returned. However, the Trial Court has passed an order to re-issue NBW to accused No.2. The order sheet dated 17.02.2020 reveals that PF was paid. Thereafter, in view of closure of Court due to CORONA (COVID-19), the case was adjourned from time to time.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is just and proper to provide one more opportunity to

HC-KAR

Complainant to take necessary steps to secure the presence of the accused. Hence, I proceed to pass the following:

O R D E R

(i) Appeal is allowed;

(ii) The Order dated 02.04.2025 passed in CC.No.6059/2019 by the XII Addl. Small Causes Judge and ACJM, Bengaluru, is hereby set aside;

(iii) The Trial Court is directed to restore the case in CC.No.6059/2019;

(iv) The complainant/appellant is directed to take necessary steps to secure the accused in accordance with law;

(v) The complainant/appellant is directed to appear before the Trial Court on 28.10.2026, without seeking any further notice. Thereafter, the Trial Court is directed to proceed with the case in accordance with law;

HC-KAR

(vi) The Registry is directed to communicate this order to the Trial Court.

Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE

DHA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 33

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead