Karnataka High Court
WP/28968/2024 of ASHAPURA JEWELLERS Vs THE KARNATAKA STATE HANDICRAFTS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., on 16 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010616072024 NC: 2026:KHC:50684 WP No. 28968 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 28968 OF 2024 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: 1. ASHAPURA JEWELLERS REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
WRIT PETITION NO. 28968 OF 2024 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN:
1.
ASHAPURA JEWELLERS
REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR,
NARPAT SINGH BALOT,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
OCC PROPRIETOR,
R/A SATYA DHAN BUILDING,
TORVI GALLI,
NEAR RAGHAVENDRA
MATH HUBBALLI,
TQ:HUBBALLI,
DIST: DHARWAD
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GURUDEV I GACHCHINAMATH.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE KARNATAKA STATE HANDICRAFTS
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,
A GOVT OF KARNATAKA ENTERPRISES,
NO 45, MG ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001,
REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
2.
THE GENERAL MANAGER MARKETING
KARNATAKA STATE HANDICRAFTS
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD,
NO 39, 2 ND FLOOR,
HC-KAR
UNITED MANSION,
MARKETING DIVISION,
MG ROAD, BENGALURU 560001
…RESPONDENTS
3. M/S SUNRISE JEWELLS
DR.D.V.G. ROAD
BASAVANAGUDI
BANGALORE 560004.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR
Y.S. RAVIKUMAR
S/O LATE Y SURYANARAYA SHETTY
…IMPLEADING APPLICANT
(BY SRI. VIVEK A R.,ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2
SRI GIRIDHAR S V, ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
TENDER
NOTIFICATION
DTD.
21.10.2024
BEARING
NO.
KSHDCL/MKTG/RE-T/887/2024-25
PRODUCED
AS
ANNX-F
ISSUED BY THE R-2 AND ALSO THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD.
21.10.2024
BEARING
NO.
KSHDCL/MKTG/889/2024-25
PRODUCED AS ANNX-E PASSED BY THE R-1.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The present writ petition is filed seeking for the following reliefs: " a. Quash the impugned tender notification dated 21-10- bearing No. KSHDCL/MKTG/RE-T/887/2024-25 produced as Annexure-F issued by the Respondent No. 2
HC-KAR
and also the impugned order dated 21-10-2024 bearing No. KSHDCL/mKtg/889/2024-25 produced as Annexure-E passed by the Respondent No. 1 by issue of writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ or order or directions.
b. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to accept the tender of the petitioner in pursuance of the tender notification dated 26-8-2024 bearing No. KSHDCL/MKTG/E-T/662/2024-25 issued by the Respondent No. 2 produced as Annexure-A and further direct the Respondents to proceed with the said tender notification and issue work order and agreement in favour of the petitioner for the said tender notification.
c. Grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble court deems fit under the circumstances of the present case including an order for costs may kindly be passed in the interest of justice and equity"
2. It is forthcoming that the petitioner seeks to quash the impugned tender notification dated 21.10.2024 (Annexure E to the writ petition).
3. Learned counsel for the respondents as well as the learned counsel for the impleading applicants submits that the said tender notification was cancelled and the material that was sought to be produced under the said tender has already been procured after the Concerned Authority has approached the Government and an exemption in terms of the provisions of the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act 1999, was granted by the government.
HC-KAR
4. In view of the aforementioned, the relief sought for in the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
6. Pending IAs., if any, also stand disposed of.
(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
Vmb List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31