Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/6138/2024 of SMT. PRAMILAMMA Vs SRI. M VENKATACHALAM REDDY @ CHALAPATHI on 16 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010346172024 NC: 2026:KHC:50611 CRL.P No. 6138 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6138 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SMT. PRAMILAMMA AGED 64 YEARS W/O SRI. N.VASUDEV
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6138 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SMT. PRAMILAMMA
AGED 64 YEARS
W/O SRI. N.VASUDEV REDDY
R/AT.NO 12, GROUND FLOOR,
NEAR KALIKA MATHA TEMPLE
2ND MAIN, VINAYAKA NAGARA
MEDAHALLI, VIRGO NAGAR POST,
BENGALAURU-560 049.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR P, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. M VENKATACHALAM
REDDY @ CHALAPATHI
S/O. SRI.M.SRIAMULU REDDY
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
R/AT. NO.57/G, KANTHA NILAYA,
B.NARAYANAPURA, KAMADENU NAGAR,
1ST MAIN, 4TH CROSS, MAHADEVAPURA
BENGALURU- 560 048.
AND ALSO AT
R/AT NO.6-11
MAEEIMAKULA KANDRIGA, MAMBEDU
PANCHAYATHI, VEDURUKUPPAM
MADALAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
Digitally signed by
PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
ANDHRA PRADESH-517 569
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 29.04.2024 PASSED BY THE
LEARNED XXXIII ADDL.C.M.M., MAYO HALL, BENGLAURU IN
C.C.NO.50027/2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-A, DISMISSING THE
CRIMINAL CASE FOR NON-PROSECUTION AND TO RESTORE
THE C.C.NO.50027/2022 ON THE FILE IN THE INTEREST OF
JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to convert this Criminal Petition into Criminal Appeal.
2. He states that, inadvertently, instead of filing Criminal Appeal, the petitioner has filed Criminal Petition challenging the order dated 29.04.2024 passed by the XXXIII Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall, Bengaluru in C.C.No.50027/2023.
HC-KAR
3. Placing reliance on memo, the petitioner is permitted to covert this Criminal Petition into Criminal Appeal. For statistical purpose, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 10