Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/10654/2024 of MR MUNEESHA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 16 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010540902024 NC: 2026:KHC:50613 CRL.P No. 10654 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10654 OF 2024 BETWEEN: MR. MUNEESHA S/O LATE VEERBHADRAIAH AGED 52 YEARS

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10654 OF 2024

BETWEEN:

MR. MUNEESHA

S/O LATE VEERBHADRAIAH

AGED 52 YEARS

NO. 603, 6TH FLOOR

OXFORD COLLEGE

STAFF QUARTERS

BOMMANAHALLI

BANGALORE 560 068

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. GOUTHAM A.R, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY BOMMANAHALLI POLICE STATION

BANGALORE CITY

BANGALORE -560 068

2.

MAMATHA H.J

NO.14, 4TH CROSS

THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD

MANJUNATH LAYOUT

NAGAVARA

BANGALORE 560 045

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1)

Digitally signed by

PANKAJA S

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528

BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR BEARING CRIME

NO.107/2024 REGISTERED IN THE BOMMANAHALLI POLICE

STATION FOR OFFENCES P/U/S 506 AND 509 OF THE IPC

CULMINATING IN THE CHARGE SHEET FILED AGAINST THE

PETITIONER AND TO QUASH ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE

THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE IN

CRIME NO.107/2024.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.

2. This Court ordered to issue notice to respondent No.2 on 21.03.2025. Despite, the petitioner has not paid process fee. As such, the matter is lying at the stage of orders since one year. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.

HC-KAR

3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.

SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE

HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 13

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead