Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/5066/2019 of P. NAGARAJ Vs STATE BY NAZARBAD P.S., on 16 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010197942019 NC: 2026:KHC:50439 CRL.P No. 5066 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5066 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. P. NAGARAJ S/O T.S.PUTTANANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010197942019
NC: 2026:KHC:50439
CRL.P No. 5066 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5066 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
1.
P. NAGARAJ
S/O T.S.PUTTANANJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/AT 245, ASHRAYA, 9TH CROSS
SRIRAMPURA 2ND STAGE
MYSURU-570 023.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SUYOG HERELE E., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE BY NAZARBAD P.S.,
MYSURU
REPRESENTED BY SPP
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001.
2.
S.N. RAMESH
POLICE INSPECTOR
CIVIL RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT CELL
MYSURU-570024.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SUHAS GOWDA M., HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. C. JAGADEESH, SPL. COUNSEL FOR R2)
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010197942019
NC: 2026:KHC:50439
CRL.P No. 5066 of 2019
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482
OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET IN
SPL.CASE NO.252/2016 BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE, FOR
THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 196, 198 AND
420 OF IPC SECTION 3(1)(9) OF SC/ST (PREVENTION OF
ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989, ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU, BY ALLOWING
THIS PETITION.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that this petition has become infructuous, since the petitioner-accused has already been acquitted by the Trial Court.
2. Learned Special counsel for respondent No.2 is present and not disputes the same.
Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2