Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/6496/2020 of MR. MAHESHA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 15 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010343232020 NC: 2026:KHC:50298 CRL.P No. 6496 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6496 OF 2020 BETWEEN: MR. MAHESHA S/O RAJAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6496 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
MR. MAHESHA
S/O RAJAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
R/AT KODEKOPPA BAVIKAISARU
VILLAGE AND POST
THIRTHAHALLI TALUQ-577 432
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K S RAJESH GOWDA, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER -577 432
THIRTHAHALLI POLICE STATION
2.
NARENDRA KUMAR
S/O GURSHANTHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
OCCUPATION .DISTRICT RESERVE
FOREST OFFICER
KONANDURU BRANCH
RIPEN PETE DIVISION
ARASALU-577 422
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU-560 001
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI MOHAMMED AYUB ALI, ADDL. SPP FOR R1; R2 – SERVED, UNREPRESENTED)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS ARISING OUT OF THE
REGISTRATION OF THE CASE FILED BY RESPONDENT FOR
ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 504, 332, 353 R/W SEC.34 OF THE
IPC IN C.C.NO.737/2019 AGAINST THE PETITIONER BEFORE
THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND JMFC COURT, AT
THIRTHAHALLI, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This matter is called twice i.e., in the morning session and also in the afternoon session and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
HC-KAR
2. The counsel appearing for the State submits that the matter is already disposed of and hence, this petition has become infructuous. The said submission is taken on record. In view of the said submission, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN