Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/9855/2024 of SUMMIAH SULTHANA Vs STATE BY WOMEN POLICE STATION on 15 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010512582024 NC: 2026:KHC:50225 CRL.P No. 9855 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9855 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SUMMIAH SULTHANA W/O OBEDULLAH KHAN AGED ABOUT 48
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010512582024
NC: 2026:KHC:50225
CRL.P No. 9855 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9855 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SUMMIAH SULTHANA
W/O OBEDULLAH KHAN
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
R/AT NO.19, PALM DE HOODS
7TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN,
KULLAPPA CIRCLE, KAMANAHALLI
BENGALURU, MYSURU DIST
KARNATAKA
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ZUBAIDA A, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE BY WOMEN POLICE STATION
(BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MYSURU)
2.
SANIYA AZMI
W/O WAHID FYZH KHAN
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
R/AT NO.5, BUILDING NO.8,
BEHIND VTU COLLEGE SATHAGALLI
BENGALURU, MYSURU DIST
KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR NO.13/2024 DATED
06.02.2024 REGISTERED AT WOMEN POLICE STATION U/S
498(A), 504, 506, 323 R/W 34 OF IPC AND SECTION 3 AND 4
OF D.P.ACT CONVERTED TO CC IN NO.4430/2024 IS PENDING
IN THE XIII ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AT MYSORE DISTRICT.
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010512582024
NC: 2026:KHC:50225
CRL.P No. 9855 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for tenth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same would be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9