CRL.A/1385/2026 of SRI.MOHAN REDDY R Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 15 September 2026

ORAL JUDGMENT

The appellants/accused Nos.1 to 3 have preferred this appeal against the order dated 04.08.2026 passed by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chikkaballapura, in Crime No.111/2026.

2. On the basis of the complaint filed by Smt. Jyothi, Chintamani Town Police have registered a case in Crime No.111/2026 against accused Nos.1 to 3, who are the appellants herein, for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘BNS’), and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(v-a) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short, ‘SC/ST (POA) Act’).

3. The appellants/accused Nos.1 to were arrested on 04.07.2026 and were remanded to judicial custody. The appellants filed an application under Section

HC-KAR

483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘BNSS’), seeking grant of regular bail, which came to be dismissed on 04.08.2026.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital, the investigation has been completed and the charge-sheet has been filed against accused Nos.1 to 3 for the aforesaid offences. The case is registered as Spl. Case No.175/2026.

5. In Column No.17 of the charge sheet against accused Nos.1 to 3, it is alleged as under; “
ಾಂಕ:03/07/2026 ರಂದು ಸಂೆ ಸುಾರು 6-20 ಗಂೆಯ ಸಮಯದ ಾ-2 ರವರು ತನ! "ಾಬತು$ %"ೈ' ()ೇ( ಾ+,-ೊಳ01ವ2ದ-ಾ34 ಆ6.ಎಂ.ಎ9 ಫ;ವ6 ಾ<ಲ! 1ೇ ಮಹ+ಯರುವ %"ೈ' ಅಂಗ+Aೆ Bೋಗ"ೇ-ಾ4ದC(ಂದ ಆತನ "ಾಬತು$ BೊಂDಾ ಆE<Fಾ
GಚಕI Fಾಹನವನು! JಂKಾಮL ನಗರದ ಡಬ' NೋO ನರುವ ಈ QೋRಾNೋಪಣ ಪತIದ ಅಂಕಣ-12 ರ ನಮೂದು ಾ+ರುವ ಆNೋU-1 ರವರು "ಾ+AೆAೆ KೆAೆದು-ೊಂ+ರುವ ಆ6.ಎಂ.ಎ9 ಫ;ವ6 ಾ<' ಮುಂVಾಗದ W,ರುKಾ$ೆ. ಆ ಸಮಯದ ಆ6.ಎಂ.ಎ9 ಫ;ವ6 ಾ<'ನ FಾX)ಾರ ಾಡುY$ದC ಎ1 ಆNೋUಯು ಾ-2 ರವ(Aೆ "Aಾ+ಯನು! KೆAೆ[ೕ ನನ! ಮಗೇ, ]ಾ]ಾ^Nೋ ನನ! ಮಕ3ಳ0 ನಮ_ ಅಂಗ+ ಮುಂQೆ

HC-KAR

Aಾ+ WಸುY$ೕ(, Wನ!ಮ_` ಾ
ಗ ಾYೇ -ೇಯ, Wನ!ಮ_ೇ -ಾXಯ ಎಂದು ಾY Wಂದೆ ಾ+ ಅFಾಚX ಶಬCಗbಂದ "ೈQಾಗ ಾ-2 ರವರು "]ಾ-ೆ ಅಣc ಆ (ೕY ಬಯುXY$ೕ(" ಎಂದು -ೇbದC-ೆ3 ಎ1 ಆNೋUಯು "Aಾ+ KೆAೆ[ೕ ಪಸು< ನನ! ಮಗೇ" ಎಂದು ಅFಾಚX ಶಬCಗbಂದ "ೈ
ರುKಾ$ೆ. ಾ-2 ರವರು ಸGಲd Bೊತು$ KೆAೆಯುKೆ$ೕೆ ಾನು %"ೈ' ()ೇ(Aಾ4 ಅಂಗ+Aೆ BೋಗುY$QೆCೕೆಂದು BೇbQಾಗ ಎ1 ಆNೋU ಾ-2 ರವ(Aೆ -ೈಗbಂದ BೊDೆ
ದುC ಆದರೂ ಾ-2 ರವರು 1ೇ ಮಹ+ಯನ eIೕ ಾf %"ೈ'g %"ೈ' ಅಂಗ+Aೆ ()ೇ(Aೆ Bೋ4ರುKಾ$Nೆ. ಅಷ<ರiಾಗiೇ ಎ1 ಆNೋUಯು ತನ! ಅಂಗ+ಯ ಬbAೆ ತನ! ಅಣcಾದ ಎ2 ಮತು$ ತನ! ಮಗಾದ ಎ3 ಆNೋUತರನು! ಕNೆf,-ೊಂ+ರುKಾ$ೆ. ಾ-2 ರವರು ತನ! %"ೈ' ()ೇ( ಾ+,-ೊಂಡು eIೕ ಾf %"ೈ'g ಅಂಗ+fಂದ -ೆಳ-ೆ3 ಇbಯುY$ದಂKೆ ಾ-6 ರವರು ಾ-4 ರವ(Aೆ ಕNೆ ಾ+ ಾlY Yb,ದC(ಂದ ಾ-3 ರವರು ಸmಳ-ೆ3 ಬಂ
ದುC, ಆNೋUತರು ಾ-2 ಮತು$ ಾ-3 ರವರನು! l+ದು-ೊಂಡು Wಮ_ನು! ಇವತು$ nಡುವ2
ಲ ಮು4, nಡುKೆ$ೕFೆಂದು ಆNೋUತರು ಾ-2 ಮತು$ ಾ-3 ರವರನು! -ೊiೆ ಾಡುವ ಉQೆCೕಶ
ಂದ ಎ1 ಆNೋUಯು ಮುp<fಂದ ಾ-2 ರವರ ಮೂ4Aೆ ಗು
CQಾಗ ಮೂ4ನ ರಕ$ಾ$ವFಾ4ದುC, ಎ3 ಆNೋUಯು ಕnqಣದ NಾO ತರ ಇರುವ )ೈr Wಂದ ಾ-2 ರವರ "ೆW!Aೆ BೊDೆ
ರುKಾ$ೆ. ಎ2 ಆNೋUಯು ತನ! ಬbfಟು<-ೊಂ+ದC ಹೂ ಕಟ<6 tಾಕುuWಂದ ಾ-2 ರವರ ಬಲಮುಂAೈ -ೆಳVಾಗ Bಾಗೂ ಬಲ ಅಂAೈAೆ ಚುJvರುKಾ$ೆ Bಾಗೂ -ೈ ಅಡw ಇಾ<ಗ ಕಟ<6 tಾಕುuನ ಏಟು ತiೆAೆ -ೊಯುC-ೊಂಡು Bೋ4ದುC, ಾ-2 ರವರನು! BೊDೆಯುY$ರುವ2ದನು! ೋ+ ಾ-3 ರವರು ಜಗಳವನು! n+ಸಲು ಅಡwBೋ4 ಆNೋUತರನು! ಪಕ3-ೆ3 ತಳ01ವಷ<ರ ಆNೋUತರು ನಮ_ನು! BೊDೆಯುವ2ದ-ೆ3 Wನ! ತಮ_ನು! ಕNೆ,
Cೕ]ಾ ಇವನನು! ಮು4,nಡುKೆ$ೕೆಂದು ಎ2 ಆNೋUಯು ಆತನ ಬbfದC ಹೂ ಕಟ<6 tಾಕುuWಂದ ಾ-3 ರವರ Bೊೆ<Aೆ, ಕುY$AೆAೆ, ತiೆಯ lಂVಾಗ, "ೆW!ನ zೕiೆ ಎರಡು ಕDೆಗಳ Yu
ದುC, ಒಟು< ಐದು ಕDೆಗಳ ಕಟ<6 tಾಕುuWಂದ Yuದು ರಕ$Aಾಯಗಳ0ಂಟು

HC-KAR

ಾ+ರುKಾ$ೆ. ಾ-2 ಮತು$ ಾ-3 ರವ(Aೆ ರಕ$ ಸು(ಯುY$ದುCದC(ಂದ ಅAೆ ಬಂದಂತಹ ಾ-5, ಾ-6, ಾ-7, ರವರು ಗiಾೆಯನು! n+,ರುKಾ$Nೆ. AಾಯAೊಂ+ದC ಾ-2, ಾ-3 ರವರು ರೆ$ಯ ಬಂದ ]ಾವ2Qೋ "ಾ+Aೆ ಆೋವನು! ಹY$-ೊಂಡು JಂKಾಮL ಸ-ಾ^( ಆಸdKೆIAೆ Bೋ4 JEKೆgAೆ Qಾಖiಾ4ರುKಾ$Nೆ. ಾ-2 ಮತು$ ಾ-3 ರವ(Aೆ ಉಂಾ4ರುವ Aಾಯಗಳ0 ಾಾನX ಸGರೂಪದ Aಾಯಗ•ೆಂದು ಾ-17 ರವರು Wೕ+ರುವ Aಾಯದ ಪIಾಣ ಪತIಗಳ ನಮೂ€,ರುKಾ$Nೆ. ಆNೋUತರು ಕಲಂ, 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 351(2), 352, Nೆ/u 3(5) n.ಎ`.ಎ9 Bಾಗೂ ಕಲಂ 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(v-a), ಎ9.,/ಎ9.‰ YದುCಪ+ -ಾŠC-2015 (ೕKಾX e‹ಾಹ^ ಆNೋಪFೆಸ4ರುವ2ದು ಇಯವNೆ4ನ ತWŒೆfಂದ ದೃಢಪ‰<ರುತ$Qೆ. ಆದC(ಂದ ಆNೋUಗಳ uರುದ• ಈ QೋRಾNೋಪಣ ಪತI.”

6. The wound certificate of the injured reveals that all the injuries are simple in nature. At the time of passing the order on the bail application, the charge-sheet was not filed. Now, the appellants/accused Nos.1 to 3 are not required for further investigation.

7. Considering the nature and gravity of the offence and prior antecedents of the appellants, I am of the opinion that, at this stage, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, it is just and proper to

HC-KAR

release the appellant/accused Nos.1 to 3 on bail with conditions. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following;

ORDER

The Criminal Appeal is allowed. The order passed by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chikkaballalpura, in Crime No.111/2026 dated 04.08.2026 is set aside. Consequently, the application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, is allowed on the following conditions;

(i) The appellant/accused Nos.1 to 3 shall be released on bail on executing a self-bond of Rs.50,000/- each with one surety for the likesum each, to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

(ii) The appellant/accused Nos.1 to 3 shall not tamper or threaten the prosecution witnesses in any manner.

(iii) The appellant/accused Nos.1 to 3 shall appear before the Trial Court on all the dates of hearing without fail.

HC-KAR

(iv) The appellant/accused Nos.1 to 3 shall not indulge in any offences.

Registry is directed to communicate this order to the Trial Court.

Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE

SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12