Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/9275/2024 of SMT. BHARATHI. P Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 15 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010479362024 NC: 2026:KHC:50224 CRL.P No. 9275 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9275 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SMT. BHARATHI. P W/O. SOMASHEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 44
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010479362024
NC: 2026:KHC:50224
CRL.P No. 9275 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9275 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SMT. BHARATHI. P
W/O. SOMASHEKHAR,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/O. NO. 48, I MAIN, NEAR PVF SCHOOL,
GYNANAGANGANAGAR, BENGALURU.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHIVAYOGESHA SHIVAYOGIMATH, ADVOCATE
-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY SHO, RAJAGOPALANAGARA POLICE STATION, BENGALURU-560 058, REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU.
2.
SRI. SHASHIRAJU K
MANAGER, CANARA BANK,
AGE ABOUT 43 YEARS
PEENYA 3RD STAGE, BRANCH NO. 03847,
NO. 139/140, KIADB ROAD,
9TH MAIN, PEENYA 3RD STAGE,
BENGALURU-560 080.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE
LEARNED III ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
Digitally signed by
PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010479362024
NC: 2026:KHC:50224
CRL.P No. 9275 of 2024
BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.17152/2022 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S
420, 409, 120(B) R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same would be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7