Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/861/2021 of K KRISHNAMURTHY Vs POLOCE INSPECTOR (SHO) on 15 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010038252021 NC: 2026:KHC:50132 CRL.P No. 861 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.861 OF 2021 BETWEEN: 1. K. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O KEMPEGWODA AGED ABOUT 54 YEAR
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.861 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
1.
K. KRISHNAMURTHY
S/O KEMPEGWODA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEAR
R/AT NO.524/1
KAMALA VEENESHESHANNA ROAD
6TH CROSS, DE, K.R.MOHALLA
MYSURU CITY-570004.
2.
HARINATH JAKKULA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
R/AT NO.36, OUTER ROAD
MUNIRABAD VILLAGE
MEDCHAL, RANGAREDDY
TELANGANA-501401.
3.
GADICHARLA SRIHARI
AGED ABOUT 49 YARS
R/T NO.36, OUTER ROD
MUNIRABAD VILLAGE
MEDCHAL, RANAGERDDY
TELANGANA-501401.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. H.B. RUDRESH, ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER NO.1; SRI. DHANUSH D. RAJ, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. VENKATESH SOMAREDDI, ADVOCATE FOR
PETITIONER NO.2)
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND:
1.
POLOCE INSPECTOR (SHO)
KRISHNARAJA POLICE STATION
MYSURU CITY, MYSURU-570004.
2.
SRI. VENKATEHNAGANAHALLI
S/O SRIKANTH RAO N.
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
R/AT NO.8, SRI SAI LAYOUT
KHADIGRAMA UDYOGA BENGERI
HUBLI, DHRAWAD,
KARNATAKA-580 001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SUHAS GOWDA M., HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. MIDHUN KUMAR ALLU &
SMT. LAKSHMI MAHATHI SETTY, ADVOCATES FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482
OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.2/2021, DATED 06.01.2021, PENDING ON THE FILE OF J.M.F.C. - IV
COURT, MYSURU, FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER
SECTION 420 OF IPC AND SECTION 51(1), 51(B), 63 OF COPY
RIGHT ACT, 1957 AND TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS
IN CR.NO.2/2021, PENDING ON THE FILE OF J.M.F.C. - IV
COURT, MYSURU.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This Court on the previous date of hearing sought time and this Court imposed cost of Rs.5,000/- each payable by learned counsel for petitioner No.1 and learned counsel for petitioner Nos.2 and 3 and the same has not been paid. Learned counsels for the petitioners is not assisting the Court, though the matter is of the year 2021.
2. The counsel would submit that petitioners were instructed to pay the cost but, the petitioners are not ready to pay the cost. Hence, petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5