Karnataka High Court
WP/10432/2026 of K S DILIP REDDY Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 15 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010230942026 NC: 2026:KHC:50286 WP No. 10432 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 10432 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: K S DILIP REDDY S/O KC SATYA NARAYAN REDDY, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
WRIT PETITION NO. 10432 OF 2026 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
K S DILIP REDDY
S/O KC SATYA NARAYAN REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
NO. 147/D, 12TH MAIN,
KORAMANGALA 3RD BLOCK,
BANGALORE SOUTH,
KARNATAKA, 560034
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SIRISH S, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. RANGANATH M A.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED HEREIN BY THE STATE.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
BENGALURU,
KARNATAKA 560001
2.
THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
REPRESENTED BY, N.B. BAROT
INVESTIGATING OFFICER/ INSPECTOR,
CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION
AHEMADABAD CITY,
GUJARAT 380001
HC-KAR
3.
IDFC BANK
REPRESENTED BY, THE BRANCH MANAGER
GROUND FLOOR, ANUGOPAL PLAZA,
NO. 610 6TH BLOCK,
80 FEET ROAD,
KORMANGALA 560095
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAHUL KARIAPPA, AGA FOR R1
SRI. PUSHKAR R, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
MANDAMUS
OR
ANY
OTHER
APPROPRIATE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.3 BANK TO REMOVE THE LIEN MARKED ON THE PETITIONER'S BANK ACCOUNT, BEARING A/C NO. 10086568945, IFSC IDFB0080152, MAINTAINED WITH IDFC BANK, GROUND FLOOR, AND PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO FULLY USE AND OPERATE THE SAID ACCOUNT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
ORAL ORDER
The present writ petition is filed seeking for the following reliefs:
"1. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate order or direction, directing the respondent No.3 Bank to remove the lien marked on the petitioner's bank account, bearing A/C No.10086568945, IFSC-IDFB0080152, maintained with IDFC Bank, ground floor, and permit the petitioner to fully use and operate the said account;
HC-KAR
2. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate order or direction, directing the respondent No.3 bank to produce all records, communications and documents received from respondent No.2 pursuant to which the lien has been marked on the petitioner's bank account;
3. Grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity."
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by marking of lien by respondent No.3 - Bank of the bank account of the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the lien to the extent of `2,00,000/- has been marked. However, the disputed of sum of `2,00,000/- has already been transferred by the bank to the concerned authorities, despite which the lien which has been marked in the account of the petitioner has been continued.
4. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 - Bank submits that if any, orders are passed, the same would be complied with by respondent No.3 - Bank.
5. In view of the aforementioned, having regard to the fact that the disputed amount is sum of `2,00,000/- and the
HC-KAR
said sum of `2,00,000/- has already been transferred by respondent No.3 - Bank from the account of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to give a representation to respondent No.3 - Bank seeking for removal of lien marked to the account of the petitioner.
6. Upon such a representation having been made by the petitioner, respondent No.3 - Bank shall consider the same and intimate the petitioner of such consideration.
7. Consideration of the representation to be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
PNV - List No.: 2 Sl No.: 62