Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/14455/2024 of FORTUNE CHITS AND MARKETING Vs SMT CHAMPI A JAIN on 15 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010729762024 NC: 2026:KHC:50234 CRL.P No. 14455 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14455 OF 2024 BETWEEN: FORTUNE CHITS AND MARKETING A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14455 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
FORTUNE CHITS AND MARKETING
A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN.
REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 892/A.
DR. MODI HOSPITAL ROAD.
OPPOSITE AGARWAL EYE HOSPITAL.
W.O.C. ROAD, 2ND STAGE.
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM.
BENGALURU-560 086
REPRESENTED BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR
SHRI. SHIVA KUMAR
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHRIDHARA K, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT CHAMPI A JAIN
W/O. AMBALAL S. JAIN,
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS.
RESIDING AT NO.02.
SHRI APARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR,
2ND K. V.LANE.
NEAR RADHAKRISHNA LODGE.
COTTONPET CROSS,
REPRESENTED BY HER
SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
SHRI. RAJESH BALDA
Digitally signed by
PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
S/O. AMBALAL S. JAIN.
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.2.
SHRI APARTMENT,
4TH FLOOR, 2ND K.V. LANE,
NEAR RADHAKRISHNA LODGE.
COTTONPET CROSS,
BENGALURU-560 053
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED
25.09.2024 PASSED BY THE XXII ADDL. CJM AT BENGALURU
IN
C.C.NO.17926/2016
REJECTING
THE
PETITIONERS
APPLICATION U/S 243(2) R/W SEC. 91 OF THE CR.P.C.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. This Court ordered to issue notice to the respondent on 05.01.2026. Despite, the petitioner has not paid process fee. As such, the matter is lying at the stage of orders since eight months. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
HC-KAR
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same would be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 23