Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/13138/2024 of LOOKMAN HAKEEM Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 15 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010662062024 NC: 2026:KHC:50232 CRL.P No. 13138 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13138 OF 2024 BETWEEN: LOOKMAN HAKEEM S/O ABBAS, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13138 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
LOOKMAN HAKEEM
S/O ABBAS,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
R/AT DOOR NO. 3-188-3,.
LOOKMAN MANZIL, MADANI NAGAR,
MUNNUR VILLAGE AND POST,
MANGALORE, D.K DISTRICT - 575 017.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. IMTIAZ B, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ULLALA P S
2.
LENIN A.V
S/O LATE VASUDEVA,
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
R/AT D NO. 9/337,
NEAR KANOLIKANAL RIVER,
ANTHIKKATT, NADUVILKARA,
CHAVAKKAD TALUK,
THRISSUR DISTRICT
KERALA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1)
Digitally signed by
PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN
C.C.NO.34/2024 ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.238/2018 FOR THE
OFFENCES P/U/S 109, 395 R/W 34 OF IPC, PERTAINING TO
ULLALA POLICE STATION, PENDING ON THE FILE OF HON'BLE
VII JMFC AT MANGALURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. This Court ordered to issue notice to respondent No.2 on 27.01.2025. Despite, the petitioner has not paid process fee. As such, the matter is lying at the stage of orders since one year. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
HC-KAR
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same would be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 19