Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/8001/2024 of SRI MUNIYAPPA C Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 15 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010401672024 NC: 2026:KHC:50222 CRL.P No. 8001 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8001 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI MUNIYAPPA C S/O LATE YALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 83
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8001 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI MUNIYAPPA C
S/O LATE YALLAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS,
2.
SMT. HONNADEVAMMA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS,
3.
SRI. GANGADHAR
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
4.
SMT. SAVITH
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE
R/AT MODALAKOTE VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI,
NELAMANGALA TALUK,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 123
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VENKATESH C.R, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY HIGH COURT S.P.P
STATE BY SHO.
NELAMANGALA RURAL POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU-5621 11
Digitally signed by
PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
SMT. MANJULA
W/O MOHAN M,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
R/AT THOTADAGUDDADAHALLI VILLAGE,
DASANAPURA HOBLI,
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK,
BENGALURU DISTRICT-562 162
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESH P, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS WHICH IS REGISTERED BY
THE
RESPONDENT
NO.1
NELAMANGALA
RURAL
POLICE
STATION, NELAMANGALA, BENGLAURU DISTRICT ON THE FILE
OF THE HONBLE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT
NELAMANGALA IN C.C.NO.2203/2016 FOR THE P/US/ 498- A,494,504,506 OF IPC AGAINST THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for ninth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the
HC-KAR
petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same would be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5